Follow Us on Google
•How Nigeria’s costliest qualification campaign ended in failure
By Joe Apu, Rasaq Oboiren, Romanus Ugwu and Bolaji Okunola
When FIFA expanded the 2026 World Cup from 32 to 48 teams, it was supposed to be Nigeria’s route back to football’s biggest stage. Africa’s allocation increased from five to nine automatic places, giving traditional powerhouses like Nigeria a greater margin for error.
Instead, the Super Eagles turned what should have been the easiest qualification campaign in decades into one of the country’s most expensive sporting failures.
More than ₦20 billion was reportedly committed to the qualification project through government support, logistics, technical preparations, player welfare, international friendlies and administrative expenses. Yet, despite the huge investment and an abundance of elite talent, Nigeria failed to secure one of Africa’s qualification slots.
The failure has left millions of supporters heartbroken. But beyond the emotional disappointment lies a more disturbing question:
How did Nigeria spend billions and still end up watching the World Cup from home?
The hidden cost of failure
Missing the World Cup is no longer just about sporting pride.
It is also about money.
By failing to qualify for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) is estimated to have forfeited at least $10.5 million in guaranteed FIFA revenue. The amount includes a minimum $9 million participation fee for qualified teams and $1.5 million earmarked for tournament preparation.
That, however, is only the beginning.
Sports economists estimate that when lost sponsorships, merchandising, broadcasting opportunities, appearance bonuses, tourism promotion and commercial partnerships are added, Nigeria could be staring at a total economic loss of between $30 million and $40 million.
Ironically, the country not only spent billions chasing qualification but also lost millions more by failing to reach the tournament.
For many observers, it represents one of the costliest failures in the history of Nigerian football.
A campaign doomed by instability
A closer examination shows that Nigeria’s World Cup campaign was undermined by problems that had little to do with the quality of its players.
Throughout the qualifiers, the Nigeria Football Federation struggled to project stability.
The appointment and eventual exit of Finidi George highlighted the absence of a long-term technical blueprint. Coaching changes became reactionary rather than strategic, leaving the Super Eagles without tactical continuity during one of the most important qualification campaigns in recent history.
Every managerial change came with different philosophies, player selections and playing styles.
Instead of building a settled team, Nigeria spent much of the campaign trying to rediscover its identity.
Billions spent, old problems remained
Despite reports of massive expenditure, familiar administrative issues resurfaced.
Questions over unpaid bonuses and allowances once again dominated discussions around the national team. Rather than focusing exclusively on football, players and officials found themselves dealing with off-field distractions that have become an unfortunate feature of Nigerian football.
The contradiction is glaring.
If billions were invested in the qualification project, why did issues surrounding player welfare continue to surface?
How much of the reported expenditure went into technical development?
How much was invested in sports science, scouting, grassroots programmes and performance analysis?
More importantly, has there been a comprehensive public breakdown of how the money was spent?
Those questions remain largely unanswered.
Too much talent to fail
Few African countries can boast the quality of players available to Nigeria.
Victor Osimhen remains one of Europe’s most feared strikers. Ademola Lookman has established himself among Serie A’s finest attackers, while several other Nigerian internationals continue to excel across Europe’s top leagues.
Yet the Super Eagles consistently failed to perform as a cohesive unit.
Instead of dominating opponents, they dropped valuable points in crucial fixtures, struggled to impose themselves tactically and often appeared vulnerable under pressure.
The eventual defeat to DR Congo in the decisive playoff merely confirmed problems that had existed throughout the campaign.
More than a football defeat
The consequences of missing the World Cup extend beyond FIFA prize money.
Participation on football’s biggest stage significantly enhances a nation’s global profile. Sponsors increase investments, brands launch campaigns, merchandise sales rise and players command greater commercial value.
Domestic football also benefits from renewed interest and investor confidence.
Nigeria will now miss all those opportunities for a second consecutive World Cup.
At a time when the country is battling economic challenges, the loss of between $30 million and $40 million in potential football-related revenue represents another painful setback.
The Accountability Question
Perhaps the biggest issue is no longer the defeat itself.
It is accountability.
When public resources running into billions are reportedly committed to a project that ultimately fails, transparency should become non-negotiable.
Nigerians deserve to know how funds were allocated, what benchmarks were set and whether value was obtained for the enormous investment.
Was there proper planning?
Were performance targets established?
Who takes responsibility for another failed qualification campaign?
These are questions that extend beyond football.They are questions about governance.
Lessons still unlearnt
Nigeria’s greatest football challenge has never been talent.
It has been administration.
Every World Cup cycle seems to follow a familiar script: coaching changes, financial disputes, public outrage, committee meetings and promises of reform.
Then another qualification campaign begins.
Unless governance, financial transparency and long-term technical planning become priorities, the Super Eagles risk repeating the same mistakes, regardless of the quality of players available.
The expanded 2026 World Cup should have been Nigeria’s easiest qualification in decades.
Instead, it has become a case study in how billions can be spent, millions more lost and yet the ultimate objective remain painfully out of reach.
For Nigerian football, the final score is damning.
₦20 billion spent.
At least $10.5 million forfeited.
Up to $40 million in wider economic opportunities lost.
Stakeholders PROFER solution
Former Ekiti State Football Association (FA) Chairman Bayo Kehinde-Olanlege has given his candid views as regards the Super Eagles’ absence from the 2026 World Cup, after failing to qualify from the Group and Playoffs.
“As regards the state of our Super Eagles and other National Teams, with particular reference to the male category, it has been disastrous since the regime of Amaju Melvin Pinnick.
“I remember I shared a thought on LinkedIn a few months back about NFF Presidents and their legacies. Apart from well-designed Nike kits, the Amaju Melvin Pinnick regime brought nothing forth as far as football development is concerned in the Nigeria Football Ecosystem.
“Unfortunately, it was not, and fortunately, State FAs have no business with the fortune or misfortune of the National Teams, including the Super Eagles.
“Super Eagles’ absence from the FIFA World Cup 2026 would affect our position in world football when the FIFA ranking is made public. The FIFA World Ranking is a points-based system used to grade national teams.
“While it primarily dictates tournament seedings, it directly and indirectly impacts player transfers in four major ways.
Work Permit Qualifications: In strict football nations like England, a player’s national team FIFA ranking determines their ability to acquire a Governing Body Endorsement (GBE). Points are awarded based on the country’s ranking (e.g., top 10 vs. outside the top 50), directly influencing their eligibility to play for top-tier European clubs.
Transfer Valuations & Hype: A higher FIFA ranking usually correlates with higher-quality national team performances. Players representing top-ranked nations command higher transfer fees, as successful global tournaments amplify their public profile and marketability.
Scouting & Market Reach: Top-ranked national teams naturally attract elite scouts from major European leagues. Players from higher-ranked countries are heavily scouted, while players from lower-ranked nations face higher barriers to securing lucrative international moves unless they play for heavily watched domestic clubs.
Release Clauses & Contract Negotiations: High-profile international players—often clustered in the top 20 FIFA-ranked nations—frequently negotiate strict release clauses or receive a guaranteed percentage of their transfer fee under FIFA’s globally mandated contract frameworks.
I think with Musa Gusau and the new coach, and then with the interest of the government through the NSC, a good change is assured
Ebi Egbe, President of FIFA and CAF-certified sports family firm, Monimichelle Sports-Nigeria, gave his thoughts on Nigeria’s miss from the Mundial. He blamed bad pitches and Nigeria having only the Godswill Akpabio Stadium, Uyo, as the only venue certified by CAF.
The Nigerian national team coach Eric Chelle appears to be making good progress in his preparations for Super Eagles matches for one key reason: most of our elite foreign-based players are playing on quality pitches that suit their style of football. In these friendlies, they have not had to deal with the transition challenges that often come with poor playing surfaces.
However, World Cup and AFCON qualifiers in Africa present a completely different challenge.
Pitch conditions across the continent can significantly affect the speed, movement, and technical quality of the game.
Many of Nigeria’s star players have been developed and conditioned to perform on world-class surfaces that support quick, possession-based football.
Football infrastructure remains a critical factor in modern football success. Without quality pitches and training facilities that support elite performance, Nigeria’s chances of qualifying for the next FIFA World Cup could easily become a 50/50 proposition, regardless of the talent available to the coach.
We still have time to address these infrastructure challenges, but doing so requires serious planning, investment, and commitment, most importantly the Government, administrators in charge of football in Nigeria and the private sector.
The focus should be on building the foundations for sustained success rather than seeking short-term applause and media hype.
For our football to thrive, we must work with our best brains; positions in offices are temporary and opportunist it does not make you the best brain in football development.
How Super Eagles World Cup miss affected business — Bar owners
Viewing centres and bar owners acrossed the federation lamented the absence of the Nigeria’s Super Eagles at the ongoing 2026 World Cup in USA/Mexico/Canada.
Super Eagles who bottled their qualification ticket for the second consecutive time, halted their dream last November during a playoff against DR Congo.
Even though the tourney has reached the Round of 16 stage, bar owners still frown at Nigeria’s absence describing it as a shame and a scenerio capable of affecting the economic sector which varies from from entertainment, food and beverages.
Owner, JG bar located at Idimu, Lagos, labelled the miss a national disgrace which should not be allowed to happen again.
“This is a national disgrace. I could remember the day Nigeria lost the playoff to DR Congo, it still looks like a dream, even till date, I’m still yet to believe we are not at the World Cup. This has seriously affected my business. I could remember the amount of income I made during the 2018 edition in Russia, that income really helped me pay some bills and I also invested the money into something profitable.
“Our absence came at the wrong time because I’ve calculated how much I’ll be making during the mundial now I have no option than looking elsewhere for survival,” he lamented.
Ibikunle Shoga, a viewing center owner at UNILAG road, Akoka, Lagos, cried foul about the time zone billed for matches. He stated the time zone isn’t a favourable one for Nigeria soccer enthusiasts while emphasizing high rate of insecurity as a factor capable of discouraging the fans.
“As yo can see, I’m in student area and there’s a limit to what I can do. If I decided to open my centre at this period, I may be sanctioned by the school authority or the police force. Although this is not a yardstick for our absence at the tourney but at the same time, had Nigeria qualified, I won’t be able to show some matches. I hereby urge the Nigerian government to help tighten our security and also hope the Nigeria Football Federation also do the needful as we look forward to the 2030 edition.”
Beer Parlour owner, Esther Oghame whose shop is located at Isheri Roundabout, Lagos, also lamented low turnout of customers due to the country’s absence.
“It’s obvious football unites us here in Nigeria and I know how much I do make each time there’s a live game. During this period my income and customers reduced despite me showing World Cup matches of other African countries who were present at the competition.
“It was later that it dawned on me that despite the high level of insecurity in the country, football still stands as topmost priority. Had Nigeria qualified, I would have made profit and more customers would have patronised my shop. I’m using this medium to beg the Super Eagles to at least try and make amends for the next edition so we in entertainment and beer business can also benefit form their qualification.”
Blame players not NFF—Garba Lawal
Weighing in on the disappointment of Nigeria not participating in the tournament, Nigerian former international, Garba Lawal, heaped the blame squarely on the players and the constant changes of the coaching crew.
Speaking to Daily Sun on his feelings watching the World Cup without the Super Eagles participating, he tactically exonerated the leadership of the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF), arguing that lack of funding to prosecute international matches was equally a contributory factor.
“It is really disappointing and discouraging watching the tournament without the Super Eagles participating. Our boys are supposed to be there because of the quality, but unfortunately, they could not live up to the expectations of qualifying to be part of the football world’s biggest stage,” he noted.
Asked where Nigeria got it wrong in the qualifier challenge, he said: “All I can say is that the players did not live up to expectations. It is left for the players, the major actors, to tell Nigerians what actually went wrong. The coaches really believed that they were the best, but their best was not enough.”
“They ought to have stepped up their games knowing what is involved in a big tournament. They would have been motivated to do better because of the uncertainty of not making it to the next World Cup, but they could not. They forgot that it is a privilege to be part of that world stage capable of turning around their career for the better,” he said.
While appraising the situation further, he exonerated the administrators, arguing: “Do the administrators play in the pitch? They did their part, but the players obviously failed to do their own part of the bargain. I challenge the players to fault the administrators on what they failed to do. No matter the way you want to look at it, the players are the main actors.”
“Some people tend to blame the administrators over regular change of the coaches, but for me, what necessitated the action of the administrator was the desperation to get results. It is very normal in football to change the technical crew if the results are not satisfactory. It is normal even at club sides.
“At a time, the administrators complained of lack of funds, and you cannot also blame them if they encountered the problem of non-release of funds. It may have affected preparations like playing enough friendly matches, which requires heavy funding, to prepare the team.
“No matter the perspective you want to look at it, the players and coaches should get a greater portion of the blame than the administrators in the Super Eagles’ failure to qualify for the World Cup.
“The players would have done better by ensuring they picked the qualifier ticket and then told Nigerians the frustrations they went through at the hands of the administrators. That was what we did during our own days,” he argued.
On what is next for the team and the country, Lawal said: “Thank God that the NFF has given the coach permanent contract including the task of overseeing the U-23 team. It is now left for him to start building the team from both U-23 Olympic team and the main team. He will not have any excuse if the country fails to qualify for another tournament, especially as the Olympic team is the future of Super Eagles. He can catch them young at 18, 19, 20 to 23 and integrate them into the Super Eagles.”
Lawal equally dismissed the clamour that Ibrahim Gusau, the NFF President, should not be re-elected for a second term, fuming: “Are those protesting his re-election congress members? I am sure that they don’t have the voting power to determine his future as the next NFF boss.”
“I am sure that the congressmen have not passed a vote of no confidence on him. And if they are still comfortable with him, the ordinary football-loving Nigerians cannot do anything either. They are the ones to determine his fate. If I were one of the congressmen, I would still vote for his re-election.
