Thursday, June 4, 2026

The Sun Nigeria

Soludo solution, civil disobedience and Onitsha market tinderbox

By Maduabuchi Dukor

In recent years, Anambra State has faced one of its most difficult socio-economic disruptions: the “sit-at-home” directive that crippled commercial activity across major cities. At the heart of this economic paralysis stood Onitsha, home to one of Africa’s largest markets and a commercial nerve center for southeastern Nigeria. We christened the pro-violent situation a “tinderbox” because it had been a mass oriented hysteria variously called sit-at-home but indeed an over estimated  civil disobedience that catches everyone cold, making rational interventions by  stakeholders very  difficult. Under the leadership of Charles Soludo, the state government launched a bold intervention aimed at restoring normalcy, confronting political resistance, and reviving economic confidence. The unfolding developments around the Onitsha market reveal a complex mix of governance, security strategy, and political contestation.

Onitsha Market is not just a trading hub, it is an economic powerhouse. Serving traders from across  Southeastern Nigeria, Nigeria and West Africa, the market supports thousands of small and medium-scale enterprises and generates substantial internally generated revenue for Anambra State. However, recurring sit-at-home orders severely disrupted activities. Every Monday, and on additional declared days, businesses were forced to shut down. The economic contradictions and social anomie are overwhelming in the agitative  political climate  of secessionists’ resistance.  Massive revenue losses for traders and supply chain breakdowns are some of the contradictions. Increased unemployment pressure and Investor uncertainty in the region was taking its toll. For a state that prides itself on entrepreneurship and commerce, the long-term implications were alarming.

Soludo Solution is a strategic intervention that restores the balance in the anthropology of  Igbo  entrepreneurial  resilience and  the clash  of nationalism and statehood. Governor Charles Soludo approached the crisis from multiple angles rather than relying solely on force. His administration’s focus enhanced  coordination between local vigilante groups and security agencies  and helped reduce fear and intimidation around market zones. The government launched public awareness campaigns encouraging traders to resume business activities, emphasizing that the state would guarantee their safety. Soludo sought dialogue with community leaders, market associations, and political stakeholders to reduce tensions and rebuild trust. By visibly supporting market operations and ensuring government presence on sit-at-home days, the administration ensured that economic activity would no longer be held hostage.

The Onitsha market tinderbox is a suffuse of misconception and clash between the practices  and notions of political resistance and civil disobedience, hence, the deluge of misconceptions in the resolution of the crisis. From the enlightenment sense of legitimate protest, it’s civil disobedience but from the Igbo secessionist struggle, its resistance. Hence, the move to end the tinderbox did not come without resistance. Various political actors and interest groups interpreted the crackdown differently. Some viewed it as necessary economic stabilization. Critics argued about methods and messaging. Some, framed it as political suppression. Supporters argue that leadership requires difficult decisions, particularly when livelihoods are at stake. Opponents question whether deeper political dialogue should have preceded enforcement. The political landscape in southeastern Nigeria is layered with historical grievances, separatist tensions, and party rivalries. As a result, any decisive action inevitably intersects with broader political narratives. Soludo’s firm stance attracted both praise and criticism. Over time, market activity in Onitsha began to normalize. Increased trader participation signaled a shift in public sentiment. Once-empty streets slowly returned to their characteristic bustle. While isolated incidents occasionally occurred, the broader trend suggested that economic pragmatism was beginning to outweigh fear.

The effort to end sit-at-home in Onitsha represents more than a security campaign; it is a test of political will, public trust, and economic resilience. Under Charles Soludo’s leadership, Anambra State has taken deliberate steps to restore commercial normalcy in one of Africa’s most vibrant trading centers. The reopening of markets signals a powerful message: commerce, when protected and supported, can become a pathway toward stability and collective progress.

The renewed hum of Onitsha’s market streets tells a story of resistance  and civil disobedience met with resolve, and disruption answered with determined governance. The Onitsha experience may serve as a governance case study in crisis management. It underscores several important lessons such as: economic stability and security are inseparable;  political resistance often accompanies structural reform; public trust is essential for sustainable policy enforcement. With the Soludo solution , the revival of Onitsha’s commercial rhythm could strengthen investor confidence across Anambra and reposition the state as a stable economic hub in the Southeast.

• Prof. Dukor is president/editor-in-chief, ESSENCE LIBRARY (Cultural and Scientific Development Centre), UNIZIK