Follow Us on Google
By Abubakar Zakkariyau
For years, Nigeria’s counterterrorism efforts were often judged by the number of military offensives launched or territories reclaimed from insurgents. While those metrics remain important, contemporary security experts increasingly agree that the real battlefield against terrorism is intelligence. The ability to anticipate attacks before they happen, dismantle terrorist networks, disrupt logistics, intercept communications and coordinate multinational operations has become the defining feature of successful national security architecture.
It is within this context that the leadership of Nigeria’s National Security Adviser (NSA), Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, deserves close examination. The recent commendation from United States President Donald Trump to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is not merely another diplomatic exchange. It is an international acknowledgement that Nigeria’s security architecture has become increasingly effective, coordinated and intelligence-driven. Although President Trump’s letter rightly commended President Tinubu’s leadership, beneath that presidential recognition lies the painstaking work of the National Security Adviser’s Office, which has quietly repositioned Nigeria’s intelligence community into one of Africa’s most active counterterrorism coordination centres.
The transformation did not happen overnight. When President Tinubu assumed office in May 2023 and appointed Ribadu as NSA, Nigeria’s security landscape remained extraordinarily complex. Boko Haram, ISWAP, banditry, kidnapping, separatist violence, oil theft and transnational organised crime all competed simultaneously for the attention of security agencies.
Each security institution possessed pieces of intelligence. The challenge was coordination. This is precisely where Ribadu’s experience became invaluable.
Having built his reputation as pioneer chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ribadu understood that intelligence is valuable only when properly analysed, shared and translated into operational outcomes.
Rather than allowing intelligence to remain compartmentalised within individual agencies, the Office of the National Security Adviser increasingly evolved into a central coordinating hub.
Today, intelligence gathered by the military, the Department of State Services (DSS), the National Intelligence Agency (NIA), the Nigeria Police Force, Defence Intelligence Agency, immigration authorities and international partners is subjected to greater coordination than ever before.
The results have become increasingly visible. Perhaps the clearest evidence emerged through Nigeria’s renewed security partnership with the United States. In November last year, Presidents Tinubu and Trump agreed to establish the Nigeria-US Joint Working Group, co-chaired by the National Security Advisers of both countries.
That decision was far more significant than many initially realised. It effectively institutionalised strategic intelligence cooperation between Abuja and Washington. Instead of ad hoc security collaboration, both countries established a structured framework covering intelligence sharing, specialised military training, operational coordination and counterterrorism planning.
Such arrangements require enormous confidence. Countries do not freely share sensitive intelligence unless they trust the integrity, professionalism and confidentiality of their partners.
The US clearly found those qualities within Nigeria’s evolving security architecture. The benefits became immediately apparent. One of the most successful outcomes of the partnership occurred on May 16 when Nigerian and allied intelligence facilitated coordinated strikes against ISIS hideouts around the Lake Chad Basin.
The operation resulted in the elimination of notorious ISIS commander Abubakar Al-Minoki alongside several senior terrorist lieutenants. Such successes are rarely accidental. They represent months of surveillance, intelligence gathering, signal interception, human intelligence operations and multinational planning.
Modern terrorism cannot be defeated through brute military force alone. Successful operations increasingly depend upon intelligence superiority. That superiority is precisely what Ribadu’s office has worked painstakingly to strengthen.
President Trump’s letter openly acknowledged this reality. His commitment to deploying elite United States Special Operations Forces to support Nigerian troops reflected confidence that Nigerian intelligence institutions now possess the capacity to maximise such partnerships.
Training without intelligence yields limited results. Training combined with actionable intelligence produces decisive outcomes. That distinction explains why Nigeria’s international security partnerships continue expanding.
Only recently, United States Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Frank Garcia, visited Abuja to deepen security cooperation. Garcia himself possesses extensive intelligence credentials, having previously served on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in Washington. His choice of Abuja as a major stop during his African tour speaks volumes about Nigeria’s growing strategic importance.
Equally noteworthy is the changing international perception of Nigeria’s counterterrorism efforts. Only a few years ago, foreign discussions about Nigeria often centred on insecurity. Today, the conversation increasingly focuses on cooperation.
Nigeria is gradually evolving from being viewed merely as a recipient of security assistance to becoming an important regional security partner. That transition reflects institutional maturity. It also reflects confidence in Nigeria’s intelligence leadership.
Other News
Closer home, Ribadu’s intelligence-driven strategy has similarly reshaped domestic security management. Across several regions, security agencies increasingly intercept planned attacks before execution. Kidnap syndicates are being dismantled through intelligence operations rather than random patrols.
Financial networks supporting criminal organisations face greater disruption. Communication channels among terrorist cells are subjected to closer monitoring. Community-based intelligence gathering has also expanded considerably.
These developments rarely dominate newspaper headlines because successful intelligence operations often remain classified. Unlike conventional military victories, intelligence successes frequently become visible only through the attacks that never occur.
Preventing violence seldom attracts the same publicity as responding to violence. Yet prevention remains the highest achievement of any security system. Another defining feature of Ribadu’s leadership has been institutional coordination.
Nigeria’s security agencies historically struggled with inter-agency rivalry. Information sharing was sometimes limited. Operational overlap occasionally weakened effectiveness.
The National Security Adviser’s Office has increasingly addressed those institutional challenges by encouraging integrated planning. This whole-of-government approach has strengthened operational efficiency across multiple theatres.
International partners appreciate such coordination because it enhances accountability and operational predictability. Perhaps this explains why bilateral security relationships continue expanding beyond the United States to include several European and African partners.
Confidence attracts cooperation. Professionalism builds partnerships. Results sustain both. Critics may argue that insecurity has not disappeared. They would be correct.
Nigeria continues confronting formidable security challenges. Banditry persists in parts of the North-West. Insurgency remains active within sections of the North-East. Kidnapping still threatens several communities.
However, serious security analysis should measure progress against institutional capacity rather than simplistic expectations of overnight transformation. No country eliminates terrorism within a few years.
Even the world’s most advanced intelligence agencies continuously confront evolving threats. The relevant question therefore becomes whether institutions are becoming stronger, intelligence more reliable and operational coordination more effective. Increasingly, the answer appears affirmative.
President Trump’s unusually warm letter reinforces that conclusion. Diplomatic correspondence between world leaders typically employs measured language.
For the American President to specifically commend President Tinubu’s determination to confront terrorism while simultaneously highlighting defence cooperation reflects genuine confidence in Nigeria’s evolving security framework.
It equally validates the quiet but significant work occurring within the Office of the National Security Adviser. Ultimately, intelligence is the invisible backbone of national security.
Successful counterterrorism planning often occurs entirely behind closed doors. Yet those unseen activities determine whether markets remain open, schools function safely, highways remain accessible and communities sleep peacefully.
That invisible architecture increasingly bears the imprint of Nuhu Ribadu’s leadership.
His greatest contribution may therefore not lie in dramatic public pronouncements but in patiently rebuilding intelligence coordination, strengthening international partnerships and ensuring that Nigeria’s security institutions increasingly speak with one strategic voice.
• Zakkariyau writes from Kano
