PDP crisis: Turaki-led faction optimistic as Supreme Court reserves judgment

Supreme Court building Abuja

From Godwin Tsa, Abuja

The faction of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) loyal to the Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, has expressed confidence that the Supreme Court will eventually rule in its favour.

In a statement by the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Ini Ememobong, yesterday, it charged party supporters to maintain calm and keep their hopes alive.

The apex Court has reserved its judgment in the two appeals by the Tanimu Turaki-led faction seeking validation of the outcome of the national convention of the party in Ibadan on November 15 and 16, 2025.

The party spokesman recalled that the apex Court had always served as the last hope of the common man and expressed confidence that the judiciary would deliver judgments that would preserve multi-party democracy and prevent the enthronement of a one-party state in Nigeria.

“The Court heard the appeals, with all parties adopting their respective processes, and thereafter reserved judgment to a date to be communicated to counsel.

“We charge all true and uncompromised PDP members to keep their faith alive, in the unwavering hope that the apex court will deliver judgments that will preserve multi-party democracy and prevent the imminent enthronement of a one-party state. The Supreme Court has, at several times in the history of our non-linear democratic experience, remained the last hope of Nigeria and Nigerians, even in the face of immense pressure and unimaginable risk,” the statement read in part.

The first appeal heard yesterday is marked: SC/CV/164/2026 filed by the PDP against the Court of Appeal’s decision, which affirmed the judgment of Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court, Abuja barring the PDP from proceeding with its national convention without accommodating the ex-governor of Jigawa State, Sule Lamido.

The second appeal, marked:SC/CV/166/2026 was filed by the PDP, its National Working Committee (NWC) and National Executive Committee (NEC) against the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Abuja, which affirmed the earlier decision by Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja restraining the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from monitoring the Ibadan convention pending when conditions precedent were met.

The court also heard the cross appeals filed by some respondents in both appeals.

Specifically, the multiple appeals are seeking to set aside the judgments of the Court of Appeal, Abuja voiding the national convention held in Ibadan Oyo State in November last year.

The court also heard the cross appeals filed by some respondents in both appeals.

A five-member panel of the apex court, headed by Justice Mohammed Lawal Garba—which had on April 14 approved an expedited hearing of the appeal—reserved the matter for judgment after all parties argued and adopted their respective briefs of argument.

After counsel had adopted their various briefs of arguments for and against the appeal, the panel held that the judgment date would be communicated to the parties.

While adopting their brief of argument filed on April 2, the appellants, through their team of lawyers led by Chief Paul Erokoro, urged the Supreme Court not only to allow their appeal but also to dismiss a cross-appeal lodged against them by a faction of the party aligned with the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike.

Meanwhile, Lamido, who was represented by Mr. J. C. Njikonye, as well as the Wike-backed faction, represented by Mr. J. B. Daudu, filed preliminary objections seeking dismissal of the appeal.

The respondents insisted that, contrary to the contention by the Turaki-led group, the appeal did not fall within the sphere of the PDP’s internal affairs.

It was the respondents’ position that both the high court and the appellate court had rightly exercised jurisdiction over the matter.

At the trial court, Justice Peter Lifu of the Abuja division of the Federal High Court barred INEC from supervising, monitoring, or recognizing any convention held without including former Jigawa State Governor Sule Lamido as a contestant.

The restraining order followed a suit filed by Lamido, foundation member of the PDP, alleging he had been arbitrarily denied the chance to contest for National Chairman.

Justice Lifu found that Lamido had been unjustly denied a nomination form, contrary to the PDP Constitution and guidelines.

As a consequential order, Justice Lifu halted the convention to allow Lamido to obtain the form, mobilize supporters, and campaign.

Dissatisfied with the decision, the Turaki-led PDP filed an appeal to set it aside.

Dismissing the appeal, the appellate court held that the PDP had resorted to self-help and contemptuous conduct by proceeding with the convention despite the restraining order.

The Court of Appeal had in its judgment now on appeal, berated the PDP for defying the November 14, 2025, judgment of Justice Lifu of the high court, which stopped the Ibadan convention.

It ruled that the party should have sought suspension of the judgment from a higher court, rather than obtaining a favorable order from another court of coordinate jurisdiction.

Breaking news & top stories

Stay connected with The Sun Newspaper

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and live updates delivered straight to your phone. Join thousands of readers already following us on Whatsapp Channel and Telegram.

Breaking news & top stories

Follow The Sun Newspaper

Get live updates & exclusive stories delivered straight to your phone.