Follow Us on Google
The Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed June 30, 2026, to rule on an application filed by activist and publisher, Omoyele Sowore, seeking the restoration of his bail and the reversal of a bench warrant issued for his arrest.
Justice Mohammed Umar adjourned the matter after both the defence and prosecution adopted their respective processes in the application challenging the court’s June 16 decision, which revoked Sowore’s bail following his failure to appear for trial on allegations of cybercrime and criminal defamation.
Sowore is being prosecuted by the Department of State Services over claims that he described President Bola Tinubu as a “criminal” in posts published on his X and Facebook accounts. He has denied the allegations and pleaded not guilty.
At Wednesday’s proceedings, Sowore’s legal team, led by R.O. Adakole and C.S. Etonyeaku, who held brief for senior advocate Adeyinka Olumide-Fusika, informed the court that the defendant had filed a motion seeking to set aside the bail revocation order, vacate the bench warrant and restore the original bail conditions granted by the court.
The defence said the application was supported by affidavits and written addresses filed before the court, arguing that the circumstances warranted a reversal of the earlier orders. Counsel urged the court to grant the reliefs sought in the interest of justice and dismiss the prosecution’s opposition.
Counsel to the Federal Government, Akinlolu Kehinde (SAN), opposed the application, relying on a counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the prosecution. He argued that Sowore had failed to place sufficient and truthful facts before the court to justify the exercise of judicial discretion in his favour, urging Justice Umar to dismiss the application.
Other News
After hearing both parties, the judge adjourned the matter until June 30 for ruling.
Shortly after the adjournment, the defence made an oral application seeking Sowore’s release to his lawyers pending the court’s decision, assuring the court that he would be produced on the next adjourned date.
The prosecution objected, insisting that such a request ought to be brought through a formal application to enable a proper response. While the defence argued that granting temporary release would not affect the pending ruling and disclosed concerns about Sowore’s health, the prosecution maintained that the court should consider the wider implications of the request.
Justice Umar declined the application, noting that granting the request would effectively undermine the purpose of fixing a date to deliver a considered ruling after reviewing all the processes before the court.
The judge subsequently ordered that Sowore remain in custody at the Kuje Correctional Centre pending the determination of his application on June 30.
