Follow Us on Google
Until recently, the African Democratic Congress (ADC) appeared to be the political platform around which Nigeria’s fragmented opposition could unite ahead of the 2027 general election. At a time when the once-dominant Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) was weakened by internal crises and leadership battles, the ADC suddenly looked like the credible vehicle capable of challenging the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).
For many Nigerians, it felt familiar. The atmosphere recalled 2014, when opposition politicians, alarmed by the growing dominance and arrogance of the PDP, collapsed their ambitions into a single platform, the APC, and produced one of the most dramatic political upsets in Nigeria’s democratic history. That merger ended the PDP’s 16-year hold on power and established, for the first time, that an incumbent president could be defeated through the ballot box.
So when political heavyweights such as former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, former Anambra State governor Peter Obi, former Kano State governor Rabiu Kwankwaso, former Rivers State governor Rotimi Amaechi, former Sokoto State governor Aminu Tambuwal, former Kaduna State governor Nasir El-Rufai and former Interior Minister Rauf Aregbesola gathered under the ADC umbrella, many Nigerians believed a formidable opposition force had finally emerged. The timing strengthened that perception. With growing economic hardship, insecurity, inflation and widespread public dissatisfaction under the administration of President Bola Tinubu, many citizens were already searching for an alternative political direction. The ADC coalition seemed ready to provide it.
Unfortunately, the coalition has now suffered what may become a fatal political rupture. What was projected as the strongest opposition realignment in more than a decade has collapsed under the familiar weight of ambition, mistrust and unresolved presidential calculations. The exit of Peter Obi and Rabiu Kwankwaso from the ADC has exposed the coalition’s structural weakness and shattered the illusion of unity that surrounded it. The collapse of the coalition is not merely another episode of opposition instability. It is a revealing commentary on the deeper crisis of Nigerian politics, a system where coalitions are often built more around personal ambition than around ideology, discipline or national vision.
From the beginning, the contradictions inside the ADC coalition were obvious. It assembled too many political heavyweights with competing ambitions, overlapping support bases and different regional calculations. Publicly, they preached unity. Privately, the unanswered question remained: who would carry the coalition’s presidential ticket in 2027? That question eventually became the poison inside the chalice.
Atiku was a dominant establishment figure within the ADC coalition of old and remains one in what is left today. Kwankwaso controlled a significant northern political structure through the Kwankwasiyya movement and still controls. Obi, meanwhile, represented something different, a mass political movement driven largely by young Nigerians, professionals, first-time voters and citizens disillusioned with traditional politics.
Other News
In the 2023 election, Obi transformed frustration into political energy. He disrupted old voting patterns, redefined political conversations and built one of the most passionate grassroots movements Nigeria has witnessed in recent times. His support base was not merely partisan; it was emotional, generational and ideological. That made him the coalition’s greatest electoral asset.
Obi’s departure from the ADC therefore leaves a massive vacuum. Kwankwaso’s exit is equally significant. In northern Nigeria, particularly Kano and parts of the North-West, Kwankwaso commands a loyal political following that cannot be ignored in any serious presidential contest. Losing both Obi and Kwankwaso fundamentally weakens the ADC’s national balance and electoral appeal. More importantly, their exit reinforces a painful truth about opposition politics in Nigeria: many alliances are temporary political arrangements held together only by convenience. Once presidential ambitions collide, unity evaporates.
Everybody wants a coalition. Everybody also wants to be president. It can’t work that way. That is why successful political mergers demand sacrifice. The APC coalition that defeated President Goodluck Jonathan in 2015 succeeded because key political actors subordinated personal ambition to collective victory. They recognised that former President Muhammadu Buhari possessed the nationwide electoral strength necessary to defeat an incumbent government. Therefore, political figures who also had presidential ambitions, including Atiku, Tinubu, Rochas Okorocha and the late Ogbonnaya Onu, who was the father of APC coalition, buried their aspirations for the larger political objective. Without those sacrifices, the APC merger would probably have collapsed.
The same principle was visible in Nigeria’s earlier coalition experiment between the Alliance for Democracy (AD) and the All Peoples Party (APP) ahead of the 1999 presidential election. Though the alliance eventually lost to the PDP, it demonstrated political maturity and strategic compromise. The AD, rooted in the South-West and inspired by the progressive philosophy of late sage Obafemi Awolowo, joined forces with the APP, which had stronger northern influence. The coalition presented Olu Falae as joint presidential candidate against Obasanjo. Crucially, Ogbonnaya Onu, who had emerged as APP presidential candidate, agreed to step aside for the alliance to work. That sacrifice became one of the defining moments of Nigeria’s coalition politics. Had Onu insisted on his ambition, the alliance would have collapsed before the election.
The ADC coalition failed to demonstrate that level of discipline. Its major actors never truly resolved the leadership question. Instead, they attempted to postpone it while presenting an image of unity to the public. But unresolved ambition always returns. Eventually, the coalition became trapped in the very disunity it claimed it wanted to cure.
Today, with Obi and Kwankwaso gone, the path is now narrower for ADC. The political party risks shrinking into an Atiku-led northern platform, with reduced national appeal. The bigger beneficiary of the ADC crisis may not even be the APC, but the emerging Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), which now appears to be attracting fresh political momentum. The movement of Obi and Kwankwaso into the NDC changes the political equation dramatically. Suddenly, a relatively new political organisation is beginning to look like the real opposition coalition ahead of 2027. More importantly, Kwankwaso appears willing, at least for now, to subordinate his presidential ambition for a broader alliance, a development that gives the NDC greater strategic coherence than the ADC ever achieved.
An Obi-Kwankwaso ticket would instantly create a powerful regional and demographic balance: Obi consolidating significant support across the South and urban centres, while Kwankwaso strengthens northern reach, particularly in the North-West. Such a combination would represent not merely another alliance of politicians, but a potentially formidable electoral coalition. That is why the emerging NDC arrangement deserves serious attention.
With the ADC fragmented, Nigeria may once again head toward a three-horse presidential contest involving Tinubu, Atiku and Obi. Contrary to assumptions, that may not entirely favour the incumbent. Obi’s continued political relevance, combined with Kwankwaso’s northern machinery, could produce a far more competitive race than many presently imagine. More importantly, the Obi-Kwankwaso alliance may become an important reference point in Nigeria’s democratic evolution. It is likely to be a case study in how opposition parties attempt to build viable alternatives to entrenched power.
Whether it succeeds or fails, it is already reshaping the conversation about coalition politics in Nigeria.
