Follow Us on Google
By Dotun Olayemi
In Port Harcourt, Nigeria, a travel agency called St Fortunes Travels and Logistics, registered also as St. Fortunes Co Ltd and operated by an individual named Fortune Chimene Amaewhule, was openly advertising positions in the Russian military on social media. The listings described roles for ‘logistics workers, drivers, cooks, et cetera.’ What they were actually selling was a frontline infantry contract in one of the deadliest wars on earth, with a $35,000 USD signing bonus attached, and the promise of automatic Russian citizenship for those who survive long enough to collect it.
The agency does not pretend to be anything other than what it is. It charges a consultation fee before answering questions from prospective recruits, a financial filter that separates the curious from the desperate, and then funnels the desperate toward a war zone thousands of kilometres from home. That an agency operating this openly has existed in Nigeria apparently without legal consequence is not a footnote to this story. It is one of its central facts.
Behind St Fortunes lies a recruitment system of continental scale. According to a February 2026 investigation by the French-Swiss open-source intelligence project All Eyes on Wagner (AEOW), now incorporated into the Swiss NGO INPACT, at least 1,417 African nationals have been processed into Russia’s armed forces since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine began in February 2022.
Of those, 316 are dead. Five of the dead are Nigerian. Thirty-six Nigerians appear in the database, and researchers believe the true figure is higher, because additional men from Nigeria and across Africa were found posting from active frontlines and do not appear in the database at all.
The report, titled ‘The Business of Despair,’ was not built on estimates or diplomatic statements. It was built on a database of names, dates of birth, nationalities, and units. It named names. It dated deaths. It traced agencies. And it left Nigeria facing a question that can no longer be deferred: who is responsible for this, and what is going to be done about it?
Nigeria’s Dead
Five Nigerians are confirmed killed in the AEOW database. They are not statistics. They are men with names, birthdays, and families somewhere in this country who received news that almost certainly came without an official explanation, a death certificate, or a body to bury.
The confirmed dead are: Abdoulaye Issaka Ismael, born 30 November 1998, he was 25 years old; Agbo Moses Omale, born 17 February 1982; Adamu Abdulai Ismail, born 1 January 2000, barely into adulthood; and Fajobi Taiwo Omoniyi, born 20 February 1975. A fifth entry, listed as Fuck Mikael, born 16 July 1978, appears in the database, though AEOW noted uncertainty about whether the name or individual is real.
On 12 February 2026, the Ukrainian Defence Ministry released photographs of two further Nigerians, Hamzat Kazeem Kolawole and Mbah Stephen Udoka, reported killed while fighting for Russia in Luhansk. Kolawole had signed a contract in August 2025; Udoka enlisted on 28 September of the same year. Both had no military training. Both died during an attempt to storm Ukrainian positions.
Among the broader cohort of Nigerians identified in the database, AEOW also found Nkosima Moses Egor, a Nigerian national holding a master’s degree in nanotechnology and microsystems technology from Moscow State University, now reportedly serving in a Russian defence institution under the service number MT-914294. He is a researcher turned soldier, in a war he may not fully have chosen.
“Of the 1,417 African recruits, 316 have been killed. 951 of those died within their first month of service.” — All Eyes on Wagner, The Business of Despair, February 2026
The Scale and the Trajectory
Nigeria is not the largest source country by volume. Egypt leads the database with 361 recruits, followed by Cameroon with 335, and Ghana with 234. But the continental picture reveals a system that has been accelerating every year since Russia’s invasion began. In 2023, 177 African nationals were recruited.
In 2024, that figure jumped to 592 — a number Russia itself confirmed, in a rare moment of transparency that now reads more like a boast. In 2025, it climbed again to 647, the highest single-year total since the war began.
In November 2025, Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha stated that more than 1,400 nationals from 36 African countries were fighting for Russia, with many held in Ukrainian camps as prisoners of war. The AEOW database, released three months later, confirms and slightly exceeds that figure, and, more significantly, puts faces and names to it. For as long as African recruitment remained a number, it could be managed as a geopolitical abstraction. With 1,417 identities attached, that option is considerably harder to maintain.
Kenya’s National Intelligence Service revealed to parliament in early 2026 that more than 1,000 Kenyan nationals had been recruited, a figure five times greater than previously acknowledged, with 89 on active frontlines, 39 hospitalised, and 28 listed as missing. Nigeria has no equivalent parliamentary briefing on record. It has 36 names in a Swiss NGO’s database, an agency in Port Harcourt, and five families who know, or suspect, that the man they lost did not die the way they were told.
NIGERIA & AFRICA – KEY FIGURES (AEOW, FEBRUARY 2026)
NIGERIA
Confirmed recruits: 36 | Confirmed killed in database: 5
Additional deaths: Hamzat Kazeem Kolawole & Mbah Stephen Udoka (Luhansk, Feb 2026)
Named dead: Abdoulaye Issaka Ismael (b. 30/11/1998)
Agbo Moses Omale (b. 17/02/1982)
Adamu Abdulai Ismail (b. 01/01/2000)
Fajobi Taiwo Omoniyi (b. 20/02/1975)
Active Nigerian recruitment agency: St Fortunes Travels & Logistics, Port Harcourt
Operator: Fortune Chimene Amaewhule | $35,000 signing bonus advertised
AFRICA-WIDE
Total confirmed recruits: 1,417 | Total confirmed killed: 316
951 killed within their first month of service
Recruitment by year: 177 (2023) 592 (2024) 647 (2025)
Top sources: Egypt (361), Cameroon (335), Ghana (234)
Deadliest unit: 7th Independent Motorized Rifle Brigade — 49 African KIA
36 African countries represented
How They Are Recruited: Two Tracks, One Pipeline
Recruitment operates on two simultaneous tracks. The first is explicit, agencies like St Fortunes that advertise military service directly, relying on financial desperation to override the obvious risk. The second is deceptive, intermediaries who disguise military contracts as civilian employment until the recruit is on Russian soil and the option of walking away no longer exists.
The deceptive track is the more common. A listing for a construction supervisor in Rostov. Warehouse management in St Petersburg. A security role with a private company in Moscow. The advertisements circulate on WhatsApp groups, Telegram channels, Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok often accompanied by videos show casing Moscow skyscrapers and luxury cars.
They target, deliberately, men who have been searching long enough that their judgment has been worn down by repeated disappointment.
One Nigerian captured by Ukrainian forces described the process in a video posted on X. His phone was confiscated on arrival in Russia. He was made to sign a contract he could not read. He underwent an intensive one-week course followed by a two-week programme, believing he was being trained for civilian work, and was then sent directly to the front. He also described a fellow Nigerian, Abubakar, who suffered a cardiac episode during training, was hospitalised for five days, and upon recovery refused to obey orders. Despite signing documents agreeing to a three-month jail term in exchange for eventual repatriation, Abubakar was sent to the frontline regardless. His current whereabouts are unknown.
A separate and documented case is that of Abubakar Adamu, whose legal representatives filed a formal petition with Nigerian authorities in early 2026. Adamu travelled to Moscow on a tourist visa issued on 16 October 2025 by the Russian Embassy in Abuja, believing he would work as a security guard. On arrival, his travel documents were confiscated.
He was compelled to sign enlistment papers written in Russian without an interpreter. His lawyers invoked the doctrine of Non Est Factum, that he did not understand the nature of what he signed, and alleged misrepresentation and coercion. Adamu is currently held in a Russian military camp, has refused deployment to Ukraine, and his legal team has demanded the return of his documents and his safe passage home.
AEOW researchers documented the pipeline directly by posing as potential recruits and contacting Boris Alexandrovich Malikov — a Russian national posting military offers on Kenyan WhatsApp groups using tactics observed across West African platforms, including Nigerian ones. Malikov operates through a shell company called OneClickVisa, and claimed to act on behalf of Russia’s Federal Security Service. AEOW dismissed the claim: evidence showed he had been seeking employment as recently as May 2025, and OneClickVisa’s website was only registered in January 2026. The episode captures the system’s essential method, false legitimacy, layered and defended, until the recruit is past the point of return.
Beyond the agency model, AEOW identified two further methods: the mobilisation of African nationals already inside Russia who advocate online for others to enlist, providing peer-level credibility; and the forcible recruitment of illegal immigrants intercepted in Russia, who are offered a choice between deportation and a military contract. For men who spent their savings reaching Russia with no means to return, this is not a choice in any meaningful sense.
The Architects: Wagner, Africa Corps, and the Chain of Command
To understand who is responsible, it is necessary to understand why responsibility is so difficult to assign. Russia’s recruitment of Nigerian and African fighters is not a single operation with a single commander. Analysts at the Robert Lansing Institute described it in February 2026 as a ‘modular recruitment ecosystem’, each actor performing a discrete function, with plausible deniability engineered into every link.
At the apex sits the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence directorate. The GRU does not post on WhatsApp or run travel agencies in Port Harcourt. Its function is strategic: identifying manpower requirements, setting parameters for foreign recruitment, and coordinating the paramilitary and civilian layers below it. The Russian Ministry of Defence provides legal cover: foreign nationals can be formally contracted under Russian law, making recruitment technically ‘voluntary’, however fraudulent the process that brought the recruit to that contract.
The operational bridge between Russia’s strategic requirements and Africa’s recruitment networks is Africa Corps, the state-backed paramilitary entity that succeeded the Wagner Group after founder Yevgeny Prigozhin died in a plane crash on 23 August 2023, ten days after leading a short-lived mutiny against Russia’s military high command. Wagner had spent years deploying across Mali, the Central African Republic, Sudan, Libya, and Mozambique, trading security services for resource concessions and building, in the process, dense networks of local contacts, government officials, military commanders, business intermediaries, that could move people, money, and information without attracting scrutiny.
Africa Corps inherited all of it, and now uses those networks across Nigeria and the continent to source recruits, validate intermediaries, manage transit, and deliver fighters to Russian frontline units.
“Africa Corps maintains recruitment pipelines built on Wagner’s prior African networks, targeting vulnerable youth through job scams and funnelling them into high-risk infantry roles with minimal training.” — Robert Lansing
Institute, February 2026
Below Africa Corps sit the private agencies that do the ground-level work — expendable by design, operating under names that can be changed and websites that can be taken down. When exposed, as OneClickVisa was by AEOW and Global Face was in Kenya, they dissolve and reconstitute. St Fortunes in Port Harcourt has not dissolved, which suggests it has not faced the regulatory pressure that would make operating under its own name untenable.
The full chain of responsibility runs as follows: the GRU designs the architecture; the Russian Ministry of Defence provides legal cover; Africa Corps maintains the operational pipeline; Russian embassies provide quiet institutional facilitation; private agencies execute ground-level recruitment; criminal and trafficking networks handle logistics; corrupt local officials look the other way; and social media platforms carry the advertisements. No single actor in that chain signed an order to recruit Abdoulaye Issaka Ismael or Agbo Moses Omale. Every actor in that chain is implicated in their deaths.
What Happens to Them
Of the 1,417 confirmed African recruits in the AEOW database, 316 are dead. Of those, 951 died within their first month of service. The 7th Independent Motorized Rifle Brigade of the 3rd Army alone accounts for 49 African fatalities. Cameroon has suffered the highest proportional toll, approximately 94 dead from 335 identified recruits, a mortality rate of roughly 28 percent.
These figures reflect a deliberate doctrine. African recruits are consistently placed in high-attrition shock assault roles, sent forward first into defended positions, absorbing fire, with no expectation from Russian command that they will survive. Ukraine’s embassy in Jordan described the practice in a 2025 statement that has not been disputed: foreign fighters ‘face a grim and often fatal fate,’ deployed in ‘so-called meat assaults where they are exposed to extreme danger and frequently killed within a very short time. Knowing that there is virtually no accountability for the death of a foreigner, the Russian command treats them as expendable, as second-tier human material. The overwhelming majority do not survive beyond their first month at the front.’
Testimonies from survivors and captured fighters are consistent: training measured in days, not weeks; no Russian language and no interpreter; racial abuse from officers; and direct frontline deployment within days of signing a contract most recruits could not read because it was written in Russian.
Multiple legal experts and civil society organisations have characterised the full process, deception about the nature of the work, coercion on arrival, confiscation of passports, absence of informed consent, exploitation of economic vulnerability, as meeting the legal threshold for human trafficking. Human trafficking is a crime under Nigerian law. The Trafficking in Persons (Prohibition) Enforcement and Administration Act is among the continent’s more comprehensive legislative frameworks on the matter. If the pipeline running through St Fortunes meets that definition, and a compelling case can be made that it does, then accountability is not merely a diplomatic question. It involves NAPTIP. It involves the Nigerian Police. It involves the question of why this agency was permitted to continue operating.
The Russian Ambassador to Nigeria, Andrey Podyolyshev, denied in Abuja that Moscow was recruiting Nigerians to fight in Ukraine. He said he was not aware of any government-backed recruitment programme and added: ‘If anybody has this information, we are ready to send it to Russian law enforcement authorities so they can investigate those cases.’
The operator of St Fortunes, Fortune Chimene Amaewhule, also denied recruiting Nigerians for military service. He said his firm previously handled a Russia-related travel package but discontinued it after receiving information that some Nigerians were switching from legitimate work visas to enlist upon arrival. He stated the package was for English teaching in Kazakhstan, not Russia, and that no clients were recruited before it was suspended. He acknowledged, however, that some clients who had travelled to Kazakhstan later crossed into Russia independently and made contact with military recruiters, and that he had declined requests to facilitate military enlistment. The AEOW documentation of St Fortunes explicitly advertising Russian military contracts with a $35,000 signing bonus stands as counter-evidence to that account.
The Federal Government’s response, through the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission, was less measured. Spokesperson Abdulrahman Balogun stated: ‘The Federal Government finished repatriation over three years ago. He deliberately enlisted himself in the army, and to do that, he must have renounced his Nigerianness.’ The Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not respond to requests for comment.
A Tactical Retreat
In late February 2026, the independent Russian investigative outlet Important Stories reported that Moscow had begun circulating an internal blacklist of 36 countries, mostly in Africa and Asia, from which recruiters were being instructed to halt hiring. Nigeria is on the list, alongside Ghana, Kenya, and Guinea, as well as Russia’s closest global partners: China, Iran, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, Venezuela, Brazil, and even Turkey. It is not a list of adversaries. It is a list of friends whose patience Moscow has exhausted.
Several governments had formally complained before appearing on it. Jordan lodged a protest in November 2025. Nepal halted work permits following confirmed deaths in Russian service in early 2024. Kenya and Togo made official representations. Whether Nigeria made any formal diplomatic representation to Moscow about its 36 confirmed recruits is not, at the time of writing, a matter of public record.
The blacklist is best understood as reputation management: Russia attempting to preserve the African partnerships that Wagner’s deployments spent years building, partnerships premised on Russia presenting itself as a security partner without conditions, an alternative to Western neocolonialism. The image of Nigerian, Ghanaian, and Cameroonian men dying as expendable infantry in eastern Ukraine is not consistent with that positioning. The blacklist is an attempt to manage the contradiction, not resolve it. The infrastructure that produced 1,417 names in a database, the agencies, the networks, the Russian Houses, the shell companies, did not dissolve with an internal memo.
Nigeria Cannot Afford Silence
Every country on Russia’s blacklist got there because it pushed back. Kenya pushed back. Togo pushed back. Jordan pushed back. Nepal pushed back. They did so because the evidence became undeniable, because families demanded answers, and because their governments correctly calculated that silence was costing them more domestically than the discomfort of confronting Moscow.
Nigeria has 36 confirmed recruits in an international database. It has two additional deaths photographed and released by the Ukrainian Defence Ministry. It has a named travel agency in Port Harcourt, a named operator, and a documented $35,000 signing bonus. It has a man currently held in a Russian military camp, refusing deployment, whose lawyers have filed formal petitions with Nigerian authorities. It has NAPTIP, mandated under Nigerian law to investigate exactly this kind of operation. And it has a government spokesperson who described a citizen trapped in a foreign military as someone who ‘renounced his Nigerianness.’
The question of who is responsible has an answer. It is layered and distributed and engineered for deniability, but it is an answer. Russia’s GRU designed the architecture. Africa Corps runs the operational pipeline. Private agencies in Nigeria execute the ground work. Diplomatic infrastructure facilitates movement. Criminal networks handle logistics. Local systems fail to intervene. And at the end of all of it, young men from Nigeria, men who were looking for a salary, not a war, end up in the 7th Independent Motorized Rifle Brigade, dying within their first month of service, in a country they may not have been able to find on a map.
That is a chain of responsibility with Nigerian links in it. Recognising those links, naming them, investigating them, prosecuting what can be prosecuted, protecting those who can still be protected, is not a geopolitical question. It is a domestic one. And it begins with the question of why a travel agency in Port Harcourt is still open for business.
“Fajobi Taiwo Omoniyi. Adamu Abdulai Ismail. Agbo Moses Omale. Abdoulaye Issaka Ismael. These are Nigerian names. They deserve Nigerian answers.”
The Accountability Ledger
For Abdoulaye Issaka Ismael, born in Nigeria on 30 November 1998, dead before his 27th birthday. For Agbo Moses Omale, born 17 February 1982. For Adamu Abdulai Ismail, born on the first day of the year 2000 — a millennium child who did not see his mid-twenties. For Fajobi Taiwo Omoniyi, born 20 February 1975, old enough to have known exactly what he was leaving behind. For Hamzat Kazeem Kolawole and Mbah Stephen Udoka, photographed in death by a foreign government and released to the world as proof of a war Nigeria has not officially acknowledged.
For the 30 other Nigerians in the database whose fates remain unknown. For those not in the database at all, still posting from frontlines that no record has yet reached.
For each of them, the question is not only who is responsible. It is what accountability, in their names, is going to look like, and when Nigeria is going to begin demanding it.
•Dotun Olayemi is a public affairs analyst. He writes from Lagos.
