Follow Us on Google
From Okwe Obi, Abuja
The Odua People’s Assembly (OPA) has defended the National Security Adviser (NSA), Nuhu Ribadu, describing recent criticisms by General Ishola Williams (retd) as irresponsible and counterproductive.
OPA said Williams’ call for the removal of the NSA lacked factual basis and could undermine ongoing efforts to address Nigeria’s security challenges.
Williams had, during an interview on Channels Television on March 15, called for a major overhaul of the country’s security leadership, including the dismissal of Ribadu.
Reacting in a statement by its Chairman, Richard Olatunji Kayode, the group said the retired general’s remarks were driven by emotion rather than evidence and risked promoting what it described as a culture of ‘permanent pessimism.’
According to him, such comments could weaken public confidence in security institutions and dampen the morale of personnel working to secure the country.
Kayode said: “His assertions lack factual support and are driven more by emotional manipulation than by evidence-based reasoning. Such rhetoric contributes to a culture of ‘permanent pessimism’ that undermines the morale of our security forces and the integrity of our national institutions. “Irresponsible criticism, as exemplified by Williams’ comments, is characterised by a lack of evidence and a destructive intent. Rather than engaging in a reasoned discourse that seeks to identify and address the challenges facing our nation, Williams resorts to unsubstantiated accusations and ridicule. “This approach not only tarnishes the reputation of dedicated public servants but also distracts from the pressing need for constructive dialogue and collaborative solutions.
“It is essential to recognise that true criticism should serve as a catalyst for improvement, offering actionable alternatives rather than merely identifying faults. General Williams’ call for the sacking of the NSA fails to present any constructive solutions to the complex security challenges we face.
“Instead, it perpetuates a cycle of blame without contributing to a meaningful discourse on how to enhance our national security framework. Such irresponsible commentary can have far-reaching consequences.
“It can damage reputations, foster mistrust among the populace and hinder the development of effective security strategies.
Other News
“At a time when unity and collaboration are crucial, we must be wary of commentary that complicates our situation and poses legal risks for those who serve our nation with honour and dedication.
“It is vital to draw a clear distinction between constructive and irresponsible criticism. Constructive criticism focuses on behaviour, providing guidance for improvement, whereas irresponsible criticism targets character and lacks supporting evidence.
“The latter is often mean-spirited, serving only to sow discord among the very institutions that are tasked with safeguarding our nation.”
He highlighted his track record in law enforcement, particularly his tenure as Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), where he earned recognition for his anti-corruption efforts.
Kayode added: “His appointment has been met with debates regarding his suitability; however, it is essential to acknowledge his proactive approach to modern security challenges, including the establishment of the National Forest Guard programme.
“These initiatives reflect Ribadu’s commitment to innovative strategies that address the multifaceted nature of security threats in Nigeria. Arguments supporting Ribadu’s fitness for the role of National Security Adviser are grounded in his performance and results.
“Under the leadership of President Bola Tinubu, Ribadu has been recognised for his effectiveness in combating banditry and terrorism. His ability to coordinate security forces and solve criminal cases stands as a testament to his competence and dedication to the safety of our citizens.
“As a nation, we must rally behind our leaders, offering support and constructive feedback rather than engaging in unfounded criticism that serves no purpose other than to undermine their efforts.
“The challenges we face are formidable and it is only through unity and collaboration that we can hope to overcome them.”
