From Godwin Tsa, Abuja
The Chief Justice of Nigeria Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun said allegations of corrupt practices and misconduct against judicial officers not backed by credible evidence shall not be entertained by the National Judicial Council (NJC).
Justice Kekere-Ekun announced this yesterday at the swearing-in ceremony of 14 newly appointed Justices of the Federal High Court held at the Supreme Court complex.
The CJN lamented that: “In recent times, there has been a troubling pattern of broad, sweeping attacks against the Judiciary. It has become fashionable in some quarters to deploy blanket allegations of corruption against the institution as a whole. While constructive criticism is legitimate in a constitutional democracy, indiscriminate denunciation is neither fair nor responsible.
“Such sweeping generalisations wound deeply. They do not merely criticise decisions; they cast aspersions on the integrity of men and women who have lived honourably, laboured faithfully, and discharged their duties with unblemished records,” She stated.
Justice Kekere-Ekun noted that: “When corruption is alleged without specificity, without evidence, and without recourse to established complaint mechanisms, the damage is collective. It erodes public trust, weakens institutional authority, and unjustly stains reputations built over decades of sacrifice. A judge who has served with integrity should not be made to stand under a cloud created by reckless rhetoric.
“Let me be clear: the Judiciary does not claim infallibility. Where misconduct is established, it will be addressed firmly and transparently. The National Judicial Council remains vigilant and will not hesitate to discipline any Judicial officer found wanting. Accountability is indispensable to judicial independence.
“But independence itself must be protected from careless assault. Criticism must be responsible. Allegations must be evidence-based. Institutions must not be casually delegitimised, for when confidence in the courts collapses, the rule of law itself is imperilled”, the CJN stated.
She admonished the new Justices to resist every subtle pressure, be it social, political, financial, or relational, as the temptation may not always come in dramatic form; “sometimes it comes clothed in familiarity, influence, or convenience.
“You must not allow either praise or criticism to distract you from your constitutional duty. Your judgments must speak with clarity. Your conduct must be above reproach. Your courtrooms must be orderly. You must be disciplined and punctual. Justice delayed through indolence or poor case management is justice denied.
“Approach every sitting with the confidence that comes from disciplined study and mastery of your case files; let your judgments reflect clarity of thought and expression; let your ears remain patient to all sides; and when called upon to decide, do so with principled courage.
“Guard your independence, jealousy. Maintain measured distance from entanglements that could compromise perception. Remember always that perception, in judicial life, is almost as powerful as reality.
Other News
“The oath you have taken today is not ceremonial language. It is a covenant with God and with the Federal Republic of Nigeria. It demands courage when decisions are unpopular, restraint when provoked, humility in learning, and steadfastness in the face of challenges.
“The robe of a Judge does not make you superior; it makes you accountable. The Federal High Court stands at a critical moment in our national life. Its docket is expanding in complexity and sensitivity. The Nation expects efficiency, coherence, and integrity. I urge you to embrace continuing judicial education, to master evolving areas of law, to adopt modern case management techniques, and to support ongoing digitisation efforts within the Court. A modern judiciary must combine principle with innovation.
“As you begin this journey, remember that reputation in judicial service is built daily through small disciplines consistently observed. You have been counted worthy among many. Let your service vindicate that choice.
She disclosed that the appointment of the new Justices followed one of the most rigorous, transparent, and technology-enhanced selection processes ever undertaken in the history of judicial appointments in this country.
The National Judicial Council and the Federal Judicial Service Commission, she explained, strengthened its evaluation mechanisms to ensure that merit, integrity, competence, and temperament were the governing criteria.
“In addition to structured peer and professional feedback and comprehensive background integrity checks, the process now incorporates a formal mechanism for public participation.
For the first time in a more deliberate and structured manner, the names of shortlisted candidates were published and members of the public were invited to submit written comments on their integrity, professional reputation, and overall suitability for judicial office.
“This measure reflects a conscious institutional commitment to transparency and accountability. The Judiciary recognises that public confidence in the courts begins with confidence in the process by which judges emerge.
“By opening a window for responsible public input, we have taken an important step toward strengthening that trust.
These reforms were not cosmetic. They reflect an institutional determination to reinforce public confidence in the process by which judges are appointed.
The Judiciary must not only be impartial; it must be seen to be composed of men and women whose emergence inspires trust. Your presence here today is the outcome of that deliberate effort to elevate standards and insulate appointments from improper influence. You must justify that confidence.

Follow Us on Google