Follow Us on Google
By Adewale Adesokan
In the high-stakes arena of Nigerian politics, assignments are rarely incidental. They are deliberate, calculated, and often reflective of the confidence reposed in key actors by the party hierarchy. The decision by the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) to appoint Kaduna State Governor, Senator Uba Sani, as Chairman of its National Campaign Council for the Ekiti State governorship election is one such calculated move that speaks volumes about his growing stature within the ruling party and his reputation as a political strategist of uncommon depth.
The June 20, 2026 governorship election in Ekiti State may, on the surface, appear as a routine off-cycle poll. But beneath that lies a deeper significance. As Uba Sani himself aptly noted upon his arrival in Ado-Ekiti, the election is a “critical political barometer” for the APC ahead of the 2027 general elections. In essence, Ekiti is not just a contest for continuity under Governor Biodun Oyebanji; it is a testing ground for the party’s national strength, cohesion, and electoral machinery ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Political parties do not deploy their most trusted hands without reason. Uba Sani’s appointment by the APC National Working Committee is rooted in a combination of factors: his proven track record in political mobilisation, his governance credentials in Kaduna State, and his reputation as a bridge-builder in complex political environments.
The letter conveying his appointment underscored this reality, highlighting his “distinguished leadership, vast political experience, and unwavering commitment” to the party. Within APC circles, this is more than routine praise, it is an acknowledgment of a politician who has consistently demonstrated the ability to navigate difficult terrains and deliver results.
Indeed, party insiders have been unequivocal. His mandate is clear: unify the party structure in Ekiti, coordinate grassroots mobilisation, sharpen the media strategy, and ultimately secure a decisive victory for the incumbent governor. These are not minor tasks; they require a blend of tact, discipline, and strategic foresight.
Ekiti State, often referred to as the “Land of Honour,” has a unique political culture. Its electorate is discerning, politically aware, and historically unpredictable. Elections in the state are rarely won by mere rhetoric; they are secured through meticulous organisation, credible messaging, and deep grassroots engagement.
This is precisely where Uba Sani’s political dexterity becomes critical. His arrival in the state ahead of the campaign flag-off signaled the beginning of a coordinated effort to consolidate the APC’s hold on the state.
Speaking at the Ado-Ekiti Airport, he struck a confident tone, describing Governor Oyebanji as a performer who has already earned the trust of the people. By framing the election as a referendum on performance and continuity, Sani is deploying a classic but effective political strategy: shifting the narrative from contestation to validation.
His endorsement of Oyebanji’s achievements in infrastructure, education, youth empowerment, and human capital development is also strategic. It aligns the campaign with tangible outcomes, reinforcing the APC’s message of governance-driven politics.
One of the defining features of Uba Sani’s political style is his ability to build consensus. In Kaduna State, he inherited a politically sensitive environment marked by ethno-religious complexities. Yet, his leadership has been characterised by inclusiveness and dialogue, helping to stabilise the political climate.
This skill set is particularly relevant in Ekiti, where intra-party dynamics can be as challenging as opposition politics. The APC’s campaign structure in the state is expansive, featuring a 57-member council that includes heavyweights such as Senate Leader Opeyemi Bamidele, Minister of Solid Minerals Development Dele Alake, and other influential stakeholders.
Managing such a diverse group requires more than authority, it demands diplomacy, patience, and the ability to align competing interests toward a common goal. Party sources have already indicated that one of Sani’s primary responsibilities is to “present a formidable and cohesive front against the opposition.” This is, perhaps, the most critical aspect of his assignment.
Beyond party dynamics, Uba Sani’s role in Ekiti reflects a deeper layer of political trust, confidence from President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the APC’s national leadership. In Nigerian politics, proximity to the centre of power often translates into influence, and influence is earned through performance and reliability.
Sani’s emergence as a key figure in the party’s electoral strategy suggests that he has become part of a trusted inner circle, leaders who can be relied upon to deliver in crucial moments. His stewardship of the Ekiti campaign is, therefore, not just about winning an election; it is about reinforcing the party’s broader political architecture ahead of 2027.
By entrusting him with this responsibility, the APC is effectively signaling that Uba Sani is not just a state governor but a national political asset.
Another dimension of Sani’s rising profile is the interplay between his governance record and his political capital. In Kaduna, his administration has focused on inclusive development, economic reforms, and social interventions aimed at improving the lives of citizens.
This governance approach has strengthened his credibility within the party, making him a compelling advocate for the APC’s agenda. When he speaks about performance and people-oriented policies in Ekiti, he does so not as a distant observer but as a practitioner of similar principles.
This alignment between governance and politics is critical. It allows the APC to present a coherent narrative that links its electoral promises to tangible outcomes.
Central to the APC’s strategy in Ekiti is the theme of continuity. By presenting Oyebanji’s administration as a success story, the party aims to frame the election as a choice between progress and uncertainty.
Sani’s messaging reinforces this narrative. His assertion that the election is “just a formality” may appear bold, but it serves a strategic purpose, it projects confidence, energises supporters, and sets the tone for the campaign.
At the same time, it places a responsibility on the campaign machinery to match rhetoric with action. Elections are ultimately decided at the grassroots, and this is where Sani’s organisational skills will be tested.
As the Ekiti governorship campaign gathers momentum, all eyes will be on Uba Sani, not just as a campaign chairman, but as a symbol of the APC’s evolving leadership structure.
His assignment underscores a broader narrative: the emergence of a new generation of political leaders within the ruling party, leaders who combine governance experience with strategic acumen.
Whether in Kaduna or Ekiti, Sani has demonstrated an ability to navigate complex political landscapes with calm precision. His role in the Ekiti election is, therefore, both a challenge and an opportunity, an opportunity to further cement his reputation as one of the APC’s most reliable political tacticians.
In the final analysis, the Ekiti election may well be remembered not just for its outcome, but for the strategic orchestration behind it. And at the centre of that orchestration stands Uba Sani, a governor whose political sagacity and dexterity continue to earn him the confidence of his party and the nation’s leadership.
• Adesokan writes from Ado-Ekiti
