I confess that I initially bought into the explanation by officials of Lagos State on the reasons for demolition of some structures in the popular Alaba International Market. The state government had on Sunday, June 18, commenced the demolition of 17 buildings it tagged distressed structures at the market.
The general manager of Lagos State Building Control Agency (LASBCA), Gbolahan Oki, who spoke on the exercise two days earlier, claimed that the affected buildings had been marked for demolition since 2016.
“The marked inscriptions from LASBCA seen on different parts of the buildings that were looking physically distressed had vacation notices as far back as 2016, 2020, 2022, and several others issued to this year, 2023,” the state further wrote in a post on its website.
Taken from the ugly spectacles and shanties that pass for shops and stalls in the markets in the state, the explanation by the state appeared convincing. Some of the structures in markets are not fit for human habitation. Others are situated at locations that hinder movement and often block water channels, making the environment perennially flooded. Genuine efforts at correcting the anomalies are, therefore, bound to earn endorsements from sincere minds. It was on that basis that I was sold to the reasons offered by the state government for bringing down the buildings in the market.
But there seem to be untidy aspects of the demolition. The president-general of the Alaba International Amalgamated Association, Mbonu Geoffrey, presented an entirely different picture of the exercise. He alleged that some buildings that were not initially marked and with no signs of defects were demolished during the exercise. He further argued that the market leaders were not carried along, and the traders not given enough time to evacuate their wares.
“The leaders of the market were never carried along neither were the property owners given enough time to evacuate their goods and this led to the unmitigated loss of wares and properties. The demolition has brought hardship and loss of livelihood,” Mbonu lamented.
This is inhuman, from whatever angle it is looked at, if so.
More pathetic is the allegation that the state government had concluded plans to take the market from the traders and hand it over to some Chinese investors to establish a multipurpose market. This is at the level of insinuation for now. But this is a system where government hardly comes clean on its intentions. It rather allows or deliberately promotes rumours to precede its actions. Moreover, the carriage and utterances of some key functionaries of government and their foot soldiers before and after the February and March elections give the Igbo reasons to feel that they may no longer be wanted in the state, after all.
In this part of the world, the maxim that the witch cried in the night and the child died in the day is not one to be dismissed with a wave of the hand. It rather comes with serious significance and inherent lessons. The demolition is coming on the heels of recent loaded expressions by the Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Mudashiru Obasa. Obasa said lawmakers would go to any length in protecting indigenes, even if it meant reversing existing laws in the state. “Lagos is a Yoruba land, as against the assertions of some people that it is a no man’s land,” he fumed.
The ownership of Lagos has never been in contention by the Igbo. The no man’s land allegation is rather an instrument of blackmail that comes handy, especially at election periods, to rouse sentiments against the people. It is also invoked any time there are plots to put the Igbo in bad light in the state.
Such was the situation in the February 25 presidential election and March 18 governorship poll when All Progressives Congress (APC) henchmen in the state unleashed their attack dogs on the Igbo and their businesses for daring to take part in the electoral process. Their sin was that Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of Labour Party (LP), who from the outset announced that he was running on the basis of his competence and capacity, not as an Igbo or Christian, was their kinsman. The LP governorship candidate in the state, Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour (GRV), was also seen as problem for the Igbo because his mother and wife were Igbo. Hell was let loose on the people.
Even after the elections, the animosity did not abate. Three days after the March 18 election, Bayo Onanuga, the director of media and publicity of the All Progressives Congress Presidential Campaign Council, kept prancing about, mocking the Igbo that they may not have had the worst, until they stopped interfering in Lagos politics.
He said, “Let 2023 be the last time of Igbo interference in Lagos politics. Let there be no repeat in 2027. Lagos is like Anambra, Imo, any Nigerian state. It is not No Man’s Land, not Federal Capital Territory. It is Yoruba land. Mind your business.”
If you tie the vehemence of the Lagos Speaker, the loose utterances of Onanuga and other unsavory developments in the state to the curious Alaba Market demolition, you can understand the concern of the Igbo in the entire thing. Former education minister, Oby Ezekwesili, is thus right in asking the governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, to provide evidence to show that the demolition at Alaba International Market is not politically targeted at Igbo people. I agree with her. That is the minimum the governor owes the people, if only to assure them that the growing anti-Igbo sentiments in the state are not aimed at their programmed annihilation.
Sanwo-Olu needs to act fast and clear the air on the matter because some irredeemable bigots in the state are already sniggering that “the demolition serves the traders right.” That is not the way to go. Injustice does not serve anyone right. The laws of the land give every citizen the right to reside in any part of the country. Section 43 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) says that every Nigerian shall have the right to acquire and own immovable property anywhere in the country. Alaba International Market, Lagos, shall not be an exception, especially as the traders are not known to have flouted the laws of the state.