Follow Us on Google
On September 19, 2026, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu promised Nigerians that they would begin enjoying cheaper transport from October 1. On that day, he said that the Federal Government, in collaboration with state governments, transport unions, commercial operators and other stakeholders, was working to ensure that the benefits of cheaper alternative energy translate directly into lower fares for commuters across the country. And October 1 came. Nigerians waited for their hopes to be renewed. Nothing of such was contained in his October 1 national address. Then, the questions started raining. Nigerians expressed disappointment that another promise had been dishonoured. As Nigerians took stock, the opposition cashed in, urging them to dust off their voter cards.
Then, like a spring, Tinubu responded eight days later, on October 9, by deciding to suspend N50 from every litre of petrol sold at NNPC stations for 30 days. This meant that Nigerians who have access to NNPC petrol stations could buy petrol at N1350 instead of N1400. Sadly, there is no NNPC Petrol Station in Dikenafai, the headquarters of Ideato-South local government area. And I doubt there is any in hundreds of other local government headquarters. NNPC Petrol Stations are built mostly in urban locations. This means that the N50 suspension will not have any impact whatsoever on commuters in semi-urban and rural locations. In those places, petrol sells for between N1400 and N1500 per litre.
Well, the decision was for 30 days. Some of its supporters argue that the 30-day window gives the government room to observe the effects before committing further. However, I doubt; therefore I am (Cogito, ergo sum), apologies to Rene Descartes. Presenting the N50 subsidy as relief for ordinary Nigerians is trading dishonesty for truth. The arithmetic does not support that claim. A N50 reduction on a litre of petrol is, for the average worker, too small, too temporary and too narrowly applied to change how much he spends getting to work. The decision simply treats a symptom while leaving the cost of the daily commute, and the scarcity that makes commuting so burdensome, untouched.
A N50 reduction is a cut of about 3.5 per cent from a N1,400 baseline. Such a cut is easily absorbed by the market and is far smaller than the pains Nigerians have lived through since the subsidy was withdrawn in May 2023, when pump prices rose from about N185 to more than N500 within days. That N50 will have no impact on the price of a loaf of bread, nor will it cause a drop in the price of junk street food. A worker who buys 50 litres of petrol in a week would save some N2500. That saving adds nothing significant to his family economy. It cannot buy him a complete dose of malaria drugs.
Besides, most urban workers do not buy petrol. They pay a bus conductor, a danfo driver, a keke operator or an okada rider, and these transport owners set fares according to their own costs, their route, their competition, their daily returns and their expectation of what passengers will tolerate. Fares in Nigerian cities tend to move upward quickly when fuel rises and move down slowly, if at all, when fuel falls. A transporter who sees his fuel bill fall by N50 a litre has little reason to lower the fare he charges a passenger. This aligns with the government’s own description of the scheme, which gives priority to public transport operators. The transporter is seen as the intended recipient of the policy, while the person who ultimately pays the fare is left to hope that the savings trickle down. They won’t!
Again, it needs re-emphasising that the reduction is also geographically and institutionally limited. It applies to NNPC filling stations only. Reports from the period of the subsidy’s removal showed that many independent petrol marketers continued selling at higher prices even after the official pump price was adjusted downward. As I hinted earlier, a worker in a neighbourhood served mainly by private outlets, or one who must buy at whichever station has fuel in the morning, may never see the discounted price at all. This presents the policy as a concession that depends on finding an NNPC station. It simply means most of the population will never benefit from the N50 subsidy.
Other News
Then, the question of time hangs over this decision. Thirty days is a short window, and anyone who has spent months planning a household budget knows that a price that returns to its previous level after a month offers no basis for changing habits or making commitments. A worker cannot relocate closer to his job, buy a more efficient vehicle, or switch to a cheaper daily route on the strength of a promise that expires before he finishes deciding. The temporariness of the measure is not a minor detail. It means the government has offered a brief pause in a trend rather than a durable reduction in the cost of getting to work.
However, the deeper problem is that the N50 subsidy offer does nothing about the alternatives that were earlier promised to give workers a way out. The Tinubu government, in 2023, promised that it would flood Nigerian roads with compressed natural gas buses, which would provide cheaper and more reliable transport for Nigerians. Everyone looked forward to it. Those buses have refused to hit Nigerian roads in the numbers promised, and the CNG filling stations that do exist are now overwhelmed. The initial rush to create such stations faded like the morning dew. Commuters who had been told to expect a cheaper option now queue for hours at stations where the gas is scarce. Many of those who rushed to convert their taxis to operate on CNG now regret their decision because the hours spent chasing gas at the stations that have it are income lost. A worker or transporter who has spent a morning in a CNG queue has lost time he cannot recover. That lost time is itself a cost of transport that no pump price adjustment can reduce. When the cheaper alternative is unavailable, the worker is left with petrol-based transport, and his fare remains tied to a fuel price that the N50 cut only briefly softens.
This is why the policy, however well-intended, fails the test of meaningful impact. Real relief for the transport-dependent worker would require a sustained fall in the cost of getting to work, a reliable supply of the alternatives the government has promised, and mechanisms that ensure that reductions reach fares and not just operators’ balance sheets. It would mean regulating fare ceilings in ways that respond to fuel prices in both directions, expanding CNG conversion and distribution so that queues shrink rather than grow, and supporting bus fleets that can carry workers at predictable prices. A 30-day subsidy window at selected stations offers none of these. It is instead a public relations gesture that makes the government feel that it has taken action while the workers who depend on transport continue to pay the same fares and pray for a renewal of their hope for cheaper transportation, a hope that keeps receding.
In the end, the people who will judge this policy are not the analysts who count the naira. They are the teachers, traders, clerks and nurses who leave home before dawn, who calculate every trip and who have been told for more than three years that better transport is coming. For them, a N50 concession that expires in a month is not a turning point. It is another reminder that the promise of affordable transport has been deferred again, and that the government’s measures, however generously described, have not yet reached the road where ordinary Nigerians spend their money and their time.
With rising despair, it would seem that waiting for a significant positive impact of the microeconomic gains of Tinubu’s reforms on the lives of Nigerians is like ‘Waiting for Godot’, who continually sends word that he will appear but never does.
