Thursday, June 4, 2026

The Sun Nigeria

Weaponising Litigation: A Worrisome Trajectory in the Current Political Dispensation in Nigeria

By Ndukwem Ogwo

In a democratic society, the courts are meant to serve as impartial arbiters—guardians of justice, fairness, and the rule of law. However, a disturbing trend is emerging in the current political dispensation: the increasing weaponisation of litigation. Rather than being used solely to seek justice, the judicial process is now, in some instances, being deployed as a strategic tool to harass opponents, delay governance, and manipulate political outcomes.

Litigation, by its very nature, is a legitimate and essential component of democracy. It provides a lawful avenue for resolving disputes, interpreting the constitution, and holding power accountable. Yet, when it is deliberately abused—through frivolous lawsuits, forum shopping, injunctions aimed at stalling political processes, or endless appeals—it becomes less about justice and more about strategy.

In Nigeria today, the courts are inundated with politically motivated cases, particularly during and after electoral cycles. Pre-election and post-election litigations have become almost as decisive as the ballot itself. Candidates who fail at the polls increasingly seek judicial intervention, sometimes not necessarily to correct genuine irregularities, but to secure through legal technicalities what they could not obtain through popular mandate.

This trend raises serious concerns. First, it places undue pressure on the judiciary, an institution already burdened with case backlogs and infrastructural limitations. When courts are flooded with politically charged cases, the risk of delayed justice in other critical matters—criminal cases, commercial disputes, and civil rights issues—becomes inevitable.

Second, the weaponisation of litigation undermines public confidence in the judiciary. When citizens begin to perceive court rulings as extensions of political maneuvering rather than impartial judgments, trust in the rule of law begins to erode. Democracy cannot thrive where the judiciary is viewed with suspicion.

Third, it encourages a culture of legal brinkmanship among political actors. Instead of investing in grassroots engagement, policy articulation, and credible elections, politicians may increasingly rely on legal teams and courtroom strategies. This not only distorts the democratic process but also alienates the electorate.

Moreover, the use of ex parte orders and conflicting court judgments has, at times, deepened political crises. Situations where different courts issue contradictory rulings on the same matter expose systemic weaknesses and create confusion in governance. Such developments can destabilize institutions and, in extreme cases, threaten national cohesion.

To be clear, the solution is not to discourage litigation. Citizens and political actors must retain the right to seek redress in court. However, there is an urgent need to discourage the abuse of this right. Judicial reforms must prioritize efficiency, consistency, and transparency. Sanctions for frivolous and vexatious lawsuits should be strengthened and enforced. Legal practitioners, too, must uphold the highest ethical standards, resisting the temptation to turn the courtroom into a theatre of political contestation.

Furthermore, electoral reforms should aim to reduce ambiguities that often give rise to avoidable disputes. Clearer legal frameworks and stricter compliance mechanisms can help minimize the grounds for litigation in the first place.

Ultimately, democracy is weakened when institutions are manipulated for narrow interests. The judiciary must remain a sanctuary of justice, not a battleground for political supremacy. If the current trajectory of weaponising litigation continues unchecked, it risks compromising not only the integrity of the courts but also the very foundation of democratic governance.

The time to act is now. Safeguarding the sanctity of the judicial process is not just the responsibility of judges and lawyers—it is a collective duty essential to the survival of democracy itself.

• Ndukwem Ogwo, Centre for Critical Thinking, Teaching and Learning, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna [email protected]