Follow Us on Google
My fellow Nigerians, as the drumbeats of another electoral season gather momentum across the landscape of Nigeria, it becomes imperative to pause and interrogate not merely the rituals of democracy but its essence. Elections, in their truest conception, are not carnivals of slogans, nor festivals of manifestos, nor contests of propaganda. They are solemn civic covenants between those who seek power and those from whom sovereignty ultimately flows, the people. They are equally not mere conspiracies of the elite to grab power and neither is it supposed to be a mere festival or process where the electorate participate in self-enslavement. Although, shamefully, most of the voters still treat their franchise as mere merchandise, the truth is that the votes, in their true nature, constitute their lives.
Yet history, both recent and distant, warns us that when politics becomes a theatre and governance becomes mere performance, democracy degenerates into a spectacle devoid of substance. It is against this backdrop that I submit, with all sense of responsibility, that as we approach the general elections, there is an urgent and non-negotiable need for the political class to prioritise the interests of citizens, not in words alone but through demonstrable deeds, for it is only through visible commitment to public welfare that faith in democracy can be renewed. My sense of it is that the continuous voters’ apathy the country is witnessing in recent electoral cycles is not unconnected with the failure to match performance with electoral promises. Consequently, this lacuna between promises and delivery must be abridged.
As it is often said, one person’s narrative can never be complete in another’s mouth. In the same vein, no manifesto, however beautifully written, can substitute for lived governance. Citizens do not eat policy documents; they eat food. They do not drive on promises; they drive on roads. They do not heal through speeches; they heal through functioning hospitals. They do not prosper in past promises but in present and future delivery. The tragedy of our political experience has been the widening gulf between declaration and delivery, between pledges and performance.
Each election cycle arrives with glossy pamphlets, elaborate town hall meetings, currency flow in deceitful mobilisation and rehearsed assurances. Yet, once ballots are counted and offices assumed, the tempo of accountability slows to a crawl. The electorate, having witnessed this cycle repeatedly, begins to retreat into apathy, cynicism, and distrust. Democracy then suffers, not from external enemies but from internal erosion. This erosion is subtle but dangerous. A citizen who no longer believes his vote matters is already halfway to democratic exile. When turnout declines, when political discourse is reduced to ethnic arithmetic or religious arithmetic, when the electorate votes not out of hope but out of fear or mere ritual, democracy loses its moral authority.
It becomes procedural rather than participatory, mechanical rather than meaningful. The danger is not that elections will cease to hold; the danger is that they will continue to hold without inspiring belief or confidence. The worst, as evident in the country, is that voters’ apathy will continue to widen.
In fact, in some instances, it may even give birth to compromises of the electoral process through rigging. That is the silent crisis confronting many emerging democracies, and ours is not immune. The responsibility for reversing this trajectory lies squarely with the political class. Leadership is not a decorative title; it is a moral burden. It is not a beautiful apparel to be coveted without being worn with trust and responsibility. It must be nurtured by the wearer for it is a public garment that should not be torn, dirtied or made threadbare.
Those who aspire to govern must understand that public office is not an entitlement but a trust. The breach of this trust is not only punishable by the law of man but equally divine. A manifesto is merely a declaration of intention; credibility is established only through action. Citizens now demand evidence, not eloquence.
Other News
They want to see schools renovated, not merely promised; electricity stabilised, not merely debated; security improved, not merely politicised. In an era where information travels faster than ever, performance can no longer be concealed behind rhetoric. Governance is now audited daily by public perception. It is important to underscore that this demand for performance is not an act of hostility toward politicians; rather, it is an affirmation of democratic maturity. An enlightened electorate is not a threat to governance; it is its strongest ally.
Every critique of the electorate must be recorded as feedback. The more citizens insist on accountability, the stronger democratic institutions become. The more leaders align policy with public interest, the more legitimacy they command. Thus, prioritising the welfare of the people is not merely an ethical obligation; it is a strategic necessity for political survival. The political class must always remember that no condition is permanent and occupation of office is ever transient. One must also acknowledge the pivotal role of institutions such as the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Electoral bodies, however, can, at best, guarantee procedural credibility, but they cannot manufacture political sincerity.
They can count votes, but they cannot enforce conscience. They can announce winners, but they cannot guarantee that winners will govern well. That responsibility rests entirely on those who seek and hold offices. Institutions provide the framework; character provides the substance. The electorate, on its part, must also rise to the occasion. Democracy is not a spectator sport. Citizens must move beyond passive observation to active evaluation. The coming elections present an opportunity for voters to scrutinise candidates not by party labels alone but by track records. What has this aspirant done in previous offices? What evidence exists of competence, integrity, and commitment to public good? These are the questions that should guide electoral choices. The electorates must not be carried away with parochial sentiments such as tribal, ethnic or religious considerations.
When voters begin to reward performance and punish failure at the ballot box, politics itself will recalibrate. When voters stop lending weight or support to subversion of electoral choices, politicians will moderate their acts. Parties will recruit better candidates, campaigns will emphasise substance, and governance will become more people-centred. A situation where parties generally throw up sycophants, charlatans, imbeciles and idiots must be eschewed. There is another dimension often overlooked: the psychology of trust. Trust, once broken, is difficult to rebuild. Many citizens today approach political promises with suspicion because experience has taught them caution. Rebuilding that trust requires consistent demonstration of sincerity.
A single good policy is not enough; citizens look for patterns of responsible leadership. They observe how leaders speak, how they respond to criticism, how they manage public resources, and how they treat institutions. Trust is accumulated slowly through integrity and squandered quickly through misconduct. Permit me to say that when fire burns cloth, smoke cannot be hidden. A Yoruba proverb says b’ina ba jo loko, majala a s’ofofo n’le which literally means truth cannot be hidden. In governance, deeds are that smoke. No amount of public relations can conceal sustained failure.
Conversely, genuine performance advertises itself without fanfare. Roads that work speak louder than billboards; an excellent example is the Lagos–Calabar Coastal Road, regardless of the controversy surrounding it. Salaries paid promptly silence propaganda; security restored calms anxieties more effectively than press conferences. Deeds, not declarations, remain the most persuasive campaign message any political actor can offer. It is, therefore, in the enlightened self-interest of the political class to embrace a new covenant with the people, a covenant anchored on service, transparency, and measurable results.
Such a covenant would transform elections from contests of personality into referenda on performance. It would shift national discourse from who is speaking to what has been done. Above all, it would rekindle public enthusiasm for democratic participation. This is the real road to the sustenance of our democracy. In reflecting on this moment, I am reminded that nations are not destroyed by the absence of elections but by the absence of sincerity in those elected. At least, United Arab Emirates and other monarchies still thrive excellently and much better than most so-called democratic nations.
The implication is that democracy may be converse or inverse. It may be the practice of electing leaders like we are familiar with or leaders electing to serve the people as shown in those monarchies. Democracy thrives where leaders remember that power is transient but legacy is permanent. The ballot confers authority for a season; service confers honour for generations. Those who seek office today must decide which of these they truly desire. As the electoral season approaches, therefore, let this be our collective admonition: let manifestos be matched with measurable milestones, let promises be accompanied by performance, and let ambition be guided by accountability. If the political class embraces this path, citizens will rediscover confidence in the democratic process. Participation will increase, legitimacy will deepen, and governance will acquire renewed moral force.
But if the old pattern persists, grand declarations followed by modest delivery or non-delivery at all, the distance between the governed and those who govern will widen further. Distinguished readers, democracy is like a delicate garden. It must be watered with trust, nurtured with accountability, and protected with vigilance. Elections are merely the planting season; governance is the harvest. May those who seek to lead remember that the people are no longer content with seeds of promises; they now insist on the fruits of performance. Only then shall democracy flourish not merely as a system we practise, but as a promise we fulfil.
