Follow Us on Google
By Dotun Olayemi
There is a particular kind of horror that does not announce itself. It arrives in stages, dressed as opportunity, wearing the language of scholarship and skill acquisition, and it is only much later, sometimes years later, that the person caught inside it understands what she has actually become part of. This is the story of the Alabuga Start Program, and it is, whether the Federal Government wants to admit it or not, a Nigerian story now.
Every week, missiles and drones fall on Kyiv, on Odesa, on Kharkiv. Ukrainian officials have described a pattern that has become almost routine in its cruelty; waves of cheap, unarmed decoy drones sent ahead of the real strike, not to destroy anything themselves but to exhaust the air defenses, to force operators to fire expensive interceptors at machines carrying nothing but empty fuselages and confusion. Once the skies are tired and the batteries are spent, the missiles that actually carry warheads arrive behind them. It is a tactic built on distraction, on cheap sacrifice clearing the way for lethal force. And it is a tactic that requires volume. It requires factories. It requires hands.
Some of those hands, we now know, belong to young Nigerian women.
They were recruited under names that sounded like uplift – technical training, paid apprenticeships, a future in aviation or engineering, a life in Russia that promised more than what waited for them at home. Alabuga, a special economic zone in Tatarstan, has run recruitment campaigns across Africa with a polish that would embarrass some of our own job placement agencies. However, and sadly so, what the glossy adverts did not hint at was that many of these women would work on assembly lines producing Shahed-type attack drones and their decoy variants, the very machines used to clear a path for strikes on Ukrainian apartment blocks, hospitals, and schools.
This is the part of the story that Nigeria has been slow to sit with. It is one thing to say our young people are being deceived and exploited abroad; we have said that for years about domestic workers in the Gulf and laborers in Libya. It is another thing entirely to say that the deception has embedded Nigerian labour inside the machinery of a war being waged against a country that has never wronged us, a war that has already killed thousands of civilians who share nothing with this conflict except the misfortune of living under its skies.
The women at Alabuga did not choose this. That distinction matters and must be protected in how we tell this story. They are not combatants. They are not architects of Russian foreign policy. They arevictims of a recruitment fraud that hinges on the same economic desperation that drives so much of Nigeria’s labour migration story. But their unwitting labor does not stay unwitting in its consequences. A drone assembled by a deceived hand still falls the same way. A distraction still clears the same sky for the same missile.
There is a second, less visible thread running alongside this one. Call it Wagner’s African harvest; young Nigerian and other African men drawn into Russian military structures through similarly opaque channels, some told they would be laborers or security contractors, only to discover the terms of their engagement once movement became difficult and options had narrowed. Where the women’s story is one of industrial exploitation, the men’s story edges toward something closer to conscription by deception. Together, they describe a doctrine, not an accident. African vulnerability treated as a resource to be extracted, whether as factory labour or as manpower for a war that Vladimir Putin’s Russia has struggled to staff from its own population.
“In ten years of handling trafficking cases, I have learned that the most dangerous recruiters are the ones who never once use the word ‘trafficking’ in their pitch and campaign for labour,” said Mrs Ijeoma Udak, a National Agency for the Prohibition of Traffiking in Persons commander who has overseen several cross-border investigations into labour exploitation schemes targeting young Nigerians. “What we are witnessing before our eyes follows a pattern we know intimately, promises of technical certification, salaries quoted in dollars, and recruiters who present themselves as partners in development rather than as gatekeepers to something far darker. The tragedy is that by the time these young women realize what they are actually in for, they are already thousands of kilometres from home, their documents often held, their contracts written in a language many of them cannot fully read. We are treating this with the seriousness it deserves, and we are building the kind of case that can stand up not just in a Nigerian court but in any international forum where accountability is being sought.”
Nigeria’s government, under President Bola Tinubu, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, has a duty that goes beyond statements. NAPTIP, our anti-trafficking agency, has spent years building cases against domestic and regional trafficking networks. The Alabuga pipeline deserves the same scrutiny, public accounting and coordination with Ukrainian and international investigators who have already begun documenting the program’s reach into Africa.
Our embassies in Moscow should be pressed publicly on what protections, if any, exist for Nigerian nationals recruited into this pipeline, and what exit exists for those who want out.
Government sources, civil society organizations working on trafficking and migration, and Ukrainian officials speaking to the tactical use of these drones all belong in a fuller accounting of this story. What should not happen is silence, the kind of silence that lets a program like Alabuga keep recruiting because the story never crossed borders into the countries supplying the labour.
“I want Nigerian parents to understand something,” Mrs Udak said. “A trafficking victim does not always look like the images we are used to, a young woman is not simply being moved into domestic servitude or forced marriage. Sometimes she is being moved into an industrial supply chain, and the harm she is being asked to enable is measured in the destruction visited on families in a country she has probably never heard much about before she signed that contract.
“NAPTIP cannot fight this alone. We need embassies, we need civil society, and frankly, we need young Nigerians themselves to interrogate offers that sound too generous to be honest,” she closed.
Ukraine’s cities will keep absorbing this war’s cruelty for as long as Russia chooses to prosecute it this way. That is a tragedy that belongs first to Ukrainians. But Nigeria cannot pretend it has no stake in how this war is fought, not when its girls may be standing at the assembly line, and not when the drones built to exhaust Ukrainian air defenses are, in some documented cases, built in part by them. A nation that prides itself on the dignity of its labor abroad owes its citizens more than silence when that labor is quietly redirected into someone else’s war. If our people are being used to make war on a country that never asked for one, what exactly we are prepared to do about it?
• Olayemi is a public affairs analyst, he writes from Lagos, and can be reached on [email protected].
