Follow Us on Google
From Charity Nwakaudu, Abuja
The Coalition of Southwest Groups has expressed concern over the recent actions of the Nigerian judiciary, saying it is a threat to the country’s democracy.
This is contained in a statement signed by the spokesperson of the group, Razak Olukayode, cautioning the judiciary on the importance of maintaining its independence, transparency, and integrity.
They alleged that the appeal court has deviated from established principles of electoral jurisprudence regarding the issue of nomination and sponsorship, which falls under the has exclusive purview of pre-election matter.
“This coalition of Southwest groups is deeply concerned about recent controversial Appeal Court rulings on the Kano State Governorship election, which has raised serious questions about the integrity of Nigeria’s justice system. We wishes to caution against compromising the nation’s judiciary and emphasise the importance of maintaining its independence, transparency, and integrity.
“The contradictions in the Court of Appeals decisions highlight the need for a comprehensive review of the electoral laws and the judicial process. It sets a dangerous precedent for future elections. Nullifying the KaKand allowing those of Osun without clear and consistent legal reasoning can lead to a loss of public trust in the judiciary and the electoral process.
“Moreover, it opens the door for potential abuse of power, as political actors may exploit these inconsistencies to manipulate election outcomes. The court’s role should be to provide clarity and consistency in interpreting and applying the law, rather than contributing to confusion and uncertainty.
“The controversies surrounding these rulings also raise questions about the accuracy and reliability of the court’s decision-making process, suggesting a lack of attention to detail and procedural irregularities. This further erodes public confidence in the judiciary.
“We emphasise the need for a review of these rulings to ensure that justice is served and the rule of law is upheld. By reevaluating the evidence and legal arguments presented, the Supreme Court can rectify any potential errors made by the Court of Appeal, thereby restoring public faith in the judiciary.
“The review of the Court of Appeal rulings on the Kano governorship elections is not only necessary to rectify potential errors but also to reclaim the threatened integrity of the judiciary. The credibility and impartiality of the judiciary are fundamental to the functioning of a democratic society, as they ensure that citizens have confidence in the legal system.
“The Supreme Court, as the highest judicial authority in Nigeria, has the responsibility to safeguard the integrity of the judiciary. By conducting a thorough review of these rulings, the Supreme Court can demonstrate its commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice for all.
By rectifying any potential errors and ensuring that justice is served, the Supreme Court can reaffirm its commitment to upholding the rule of law and maintaining the principles of justice and fairness within the Nigerian democratic system.
“The judiciary should exercise caution and impartiality when making decisions that impact the democratic process.
“In conclusion, we urge President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to act as a true statesman and renowned democrat by upholding the principles of separation of powers, particularly the independence of the judiciary.
“By allowing the free, fair, and uninterrupted application of justice, President Tinubu will demonstrate his commitment to the rule of law and ensure the continued strength of Nigeria’s democratic institutions. It is crucial for him to avoid any interference with the course of justice, keeping in mind that he himself has benefited from fair judicial adjudication.
“Interference with the course of justice poses a significant threat to the principles of separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary. Such interference can lead to a compromised justice system, eroding public trust and undermining the rule of law.
“President Tinubu must be cautious not to allow his name to be smeared in the dirty game of interference, as it would not only tarnish his reputation but also weaken the democratic fabric of the nation.”
