Follow Us on Google
By Fidelis Eduvie
Governor Sheriff Oborevwori’s defection from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC) on April 23, 2025, will be remembered as one of those moments that quietly reset the political compass of the Fourth Republic. It was not merely the movement of one man from one political party to another. It was a Tsunami by the entire PDP structure in the state.
He emerged as the first sitting opposition governor to cross over to the ruling party, a step that required political nerve in a country where defections are common but rarely so symbolic. And what made his move particularly bold was the context in which it occurred.
Delta State had long been considered one of the strongholds of the PDP. To defect from such a base was to disrupt an entrenched political culture. Yet Oborevwori did not defect alone. He moved with his predecessor and PDP vice-presidential candidate in the 2023 elections, Ifeanyi Okowa, and the broader party structure in the state, effectively collapsing the old order in one sweep.
Governors are chief executives of their states, but their success is often tied to alignment with the centre. For example, security architecture, infrastructure funding, and fiscal levers remain heavily federal.
By aligning Delta with the ruling party, Oborevwori positioned his state for greater access and relevance in national decision-making. Critics may call this survival politics while supporters may see it as responsible governance.
Indeed, as to be expected, some political analysts blasted the move, misreading it and describing it as selfish. Thankfully, the Chief Press Secretary to the Governor, Sir Festus Ahon, quickly responded.
“While we respect the right of all political parties to participate in democratic discourse, it is important to correct the misrepresentations and set the record straight,” Ahon said in a statement, concerning the defection.
“Governor Oborevwori’s decision to align with the APC is a strategic and thoughtful move driven by a singular objective: to fast-track Delta State’s development through enhanced collaboration with the federal government. This decision is not about political survival or personal ambition, it is about putting Delta first. At this critical juncture in Nigeria’s democratic evolution, alignment with the center offers states the opportunity to attract greater federal support, foster inclusive governance, and unlock critical infrastructure and economic investments. As a seasoned legislator and grassroots politician, Oborevwori understands that Delta State cannot afford to remain on the periphery of national politics. His defection reflects a bold and necessary step to reposition the state for lasting progress.”
Of course, the APC welcomed the defection. Which party wouldn’t, considering that at its base, politics is just a game of numbers. In a statement, the National Publicity Secretary of the APC, Felix Morka, expressed the party’s welcome.
“Our great party welcomes this important development and assures the governor, as well as incoming leaders and members of Delta PDP, of our fullest cooperation and accommodation within the APC family,” part of the statement read.
“We are delighted that Delta State now stands poised to contribute maximally to the success and realisation of the Renewed Hope Agenda of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, and the enduring good and prosperity of Deltans and all Nigerians.”
Once the first dam broke, others found the crossing less risky. The subsequent wave of defections by other state governors underlines this point. Enter Akwa Ibom, Enugu, Bayelsa, Rivers, Plateau, and Taraba.
Plateau State Governor, Caleb Mutfwang, framed his decision to align with APC in the language of development and cooperation, arguing that alignment with the centre would better serve Plateau’s interests. That was similar to what Umo Eno Peter Mbah and Duoye Diri expressed. This same logic that Oborevwori seems to have normalised. In Rivers State, the defection of Governor Siminalayi Fubara added intrigue to political drama surrounding his administration’s internal conflicts. However, the symbolism of the defection is potent. The ruling party is becoming the gravitational centre around which Nigeria’s power struggles revolve.
In Akwa Ibom, Governor Umo Eno, stopped short of saying PDP was dead and buried as reason for defecting.
“We have worked very hard but we know that at the national level, our party is not performing as expected,” he said.
There are also governors who have not yet formally defected but have signaled alignment with the Tinubu administration. These gestures suggest that Oborevwori’s defection did not merely trigger a chain reaction. It may just have reshaped how governors calculate their political futures.
In all of this, critics warn of a creeping one-party state, arguing that the collapse of opposition parties weakens democracy. That concern has merit but it is also important to realise that there is freedom of association, a right every Nigerian, including the politicians, have. Also, the governors who have defected have done so publicly, often citing development and cooperation as motivations. Anyway, by being first, Oborevwori forced a national conversation about what parties actually stand for beyond electoral convenience.
Nevertheless, it is amusing to read comments from persons who should be astute at the game of politics. Don’t they understand that the survival of political parties is dependent on the politicians and not the other way around. Were we not living witnesses to how the politicians in the PDP steadily grew the party from 1999, capturing different states, till federal power was wrestled from it in 2015. How about the short-lived cult-like power the Labour Party assumed in the run up of the 2023 election? And how it is fizzling and sizzling out as some key LP members and erstwhile PDP members are congregating once again in African Democratic Congress, ADC, another opposition party. Were it to be either PDP, LP, or ADC, the governors were defecting to, wouldn’t the ‘winning’ parties be happy? Would there be rants of one-party state? Well, too bad and too sad for the losers.
There is simply no explanation that would make sense to the blind and deaf critic. But one thing is clear. Unlike the flamboyant defections of earlier eras, Oborevwori’s was notably restrained. There was no dramatic denunciation of his former party. Instead, the emphasis was on continuity of governance. That tone has been echoed by other defecting governors. In a country weary of endless political drama, this subtlety itself can be read as progressive.
Ultimately, history may judge Oborevwori less by the party he joined than by the precedent he set. He demonstrated that political courage in Nigeria does not always take the form of defiance. By moving first, he absorbed the political risk that others would later avoid.
Whether this emerging consensus strengthens or weakens Nigeria’s democracy will depend on what the ruling party does with its expanded influence. If dominance leads to arrogance, the critics will be vindicated. If it leads to broader inclusion, policy coherence, and measurable improvements in governance, then Oborevwori’s bold step may be remembered as the opening chapter of a more functional political era.
For now, what is clear is that Oborevwori’s defection was not an act of political convenience, but a catalyst that reshaped the calculations of power across the country. His courage and boldness deserves salutation.
