Follow Us on Google
By Paul Nwosu
When Nigeria’s First Lady, Senator Oluremi Tinubu, arrives in Anambra State on Thursday, September 10, she will be coming with an agenda that goes beyond the usual protocol of an official state visit.
She is billed to empower 5,000 Ndi Anambra under the Progressives United Against Poverty Initiative, a partnership championed by Anambra State Government in support of the Renewed Hope Initiative of the President’s wife. Her itinerary will also include the inauguration of the ICT Centre at the Federal Polytechnic, Oko, while the visit will provide an opportunity for the launch of the National Community Food Bank Programme for the South-East.
These are important engagements. But perhaps the most important question is not what will happen on September 10. It is what happens after September 10. That is where the real test begins.
There is a temptation with empowerment programmes to celebrate the numbers. Five thousand beneficiaries, thousands of items distributed, thousands of people reached. These are useful statistics, but they should not become the ultimate measure of success.
The bigger question is whether the intervention will help beneficiaries move from economic vulnerability to sustainable livelihoods.
There is a fundamental difference between relief and empowerment. Relief helps someone survive today. Empowerment should give that person the capacity to stand tomorrow.
This distinction matters greatly in Anambra, where enterprise is deeply woven into the social and economic character of the people. Ndi Anambra are traders, manufacturers, farmers, artisans, technology entrepreneurs, transport operators and service providers. What many require is not simply a handout but the right combination of capital, skills, equipment, mentorship and access to markets to make their enterprise sustainable.
This is why the 5,000 beneficiaries should ideally not be seen as the end-users of a government intervention but as the beginning of an economic journey.
If a beneficiary receives equipment or capital and is subsequently able to establish a viable business, employ two or three people and expand production, the impact has moved beyond one individual. If those employees can, in turn, support their families and grow economically, the original intervention begins to acquire transformational value. That is the kind of empowerment Madam Tinubu and her host should be extending to Ndi Anambra; I don’t know about other parts of the country.
There is considerable value in combining federal programmes with the state’s understanding of its communities and its development priorities. Proper coordination can prevent duplication, improve targeting and ensure that interventions do not disappear once the ceremony is over.
The beneficiaries should be followed up. They should be mentored. Where necessary, they should be organised into cooperatives and connected to appropriate financial institutions and markets.
The proposed Community Food Bank Programme deserves more than ceremonial attention. At a time when food affordability is a major concern for Nigerian families, food banks can provide an important safety net for vulnerable households. But the bigger ambition must be to build a food system in which fewer families require emergency assistance in the first place.
Anambra has enormous agricultural, commercial and human capital. The challenge is to connect these assets more effectively from production to processing, storage, transportation and distribution.
Other News
In other words, we must feed the vulnerable today while simultaneously building the capacity to produce enough food to reduce vulnerability tomorrow.
The commissioning of the ICT Centre at the Federal Polytechnic, Oko, also introduces another dimension to the visit that should not be overlooked.
Poverty reduction in the 21st century cannot be separated from access to technology, digital skills and the knowledge economy. An ICT centre in an institution of higher learning can become much more than another infrastructure project if it is deliberately connected to skills acquisition, innovation, entrepreneurship and employment opportunities for young people. Properly synced with the Solution Innovation District (SID), the ICT Centre, Oko, could become more than an academic facility, helping transform Anambra into Nigeria’s hi-tech capital and a regional hub for digital innovation.
This is particularly important because the future of Nigeria’s young population cannot be secured by government employment alone. We must create an environment in which young Nigerians can acquire skills, build enterprises and participate meaningfully in an increasingly digital economy.
There is, however, another interesting dimension to Mrs Tinubu’s visit, one that may not appear anywhere in the official itinerary.
Her presence in Anambra, coming at a time when the state’s political leadership and the federal administration have increasingly demonstrated cooperation, can be viewed as an informal recognition of what has become something of a slogan here: “Progressives are working together.” That phrase carries significance beyond political rhetoric.
Where different levels of government work together for the benefit of citizens, ideological and political differences should not become obstacles to development. The people ultimately care less about who gets the political credit and more about whether roads are built, businesses survive, young people find opportunities and vulnerable families receive support. Anambra can therefore use this emerging relationship to its advantage.
But partnership must ultimately be judged by results. The First Lady’s visit should not be reduced to political symbolism, just as the empowerment of 5,000 people should not be reduced to a colourful ceremony.
The real scorecard should come later. How many beneficiaries are still in business six months from now? How many have expanded their enterprises? How many jobs have been created? How many families have become more economically secure? How many young people have acquired skills that translate into actual income? Those are the questions that will matter.
Indeed, the most powerful legacy of the September 10 intervention would be if, years from now, some of the 5,000 beneficiaries can look back and say: “That was the moment my economic story changed.” That is the difference between empowerment as an event and empowerment as transformation.
Mrs Tinubu’s visit presents Anambra with an opportunity to demonstrate that government interventions can be designed not merely to distribute resources but to unlock human potential.
The ultimate objective should be simple: assistance must become a bridge to self-reliance, not a permanent destination.
If the 5,000 beneficiaries can be supported to build sustainable enterprises, if the Food Bank can complement rather than substitute for food production, if the Oko ICT Centre can become a hub for digital opportunity, and if the Federal-State partnership can translate into more practical interventions, then September 10 will have significance far beyond the ceremonies of the day. If the people empowered that day go home and begin to produce, earn, employ and prosper, then something truly meaningful would have happened.
And that is when we can say, without reservation that empowerment has become transformation.
