By Lukman Olabiyi
First Bank PLC, has urged the Federal High Court, Lagos, to uphold an order freezing the assets and accounts of General Hydrocarbons Limited (GHL) and its related entities, pending the outcome of a substantive suit aimed at recovering a loan of $225.8 million extended to the oil company.
The bank made the application through its lawyer, Victor Ogude, while responding to an application filed by GHL seeking to lift the order, which it contended was obtained through the concealment of important facts.
Justice Dipeolu had, on December 30, 2024, granted an ex-parte order restricting all commercial banks from releasing or dealing with any assets or monies belonging to General Hydrocarbons Limited, its agents, subsidiaries, or sister companies up to the amount claimed by the plaintiffs.
The judge had also issued a preliminary injunction that bars Nduka Obaigbena, Efe Damilola Obaigbena, and Olabisi Eka Obaigbena, directors of General Hydrocarbons Limited from transferring or dissipating any of their assets located in Nigeria, whether movable or immovable until the court decides on the Motion on Notice for an interlocutory injunction. Other respondents in the suit include GHL 121 Ltd, Aimonte Nigeria Limited, Calidin Global Resources Limited, CESL Oyo Production BBC Limited (owner of FPSO Tamara Tokoni), CESL Oyo Production O&M Limited, and VITOL SA. While arguing for the lifting of the order, GHL’s attorney, Abiodun Layonu, claimed that the bank’s suit represents an abuse of the court process. He also claimed that the bank had failed to disclose an earlier order granted by Justice Ambrose Lewis-Allagoa that restrained the bank from taking further action to recover the loan until the parties subjected themselves to arbitration.
Layonu urged the court to dismiss the Mareva injunction, arguing that the court was misled into granting it and that it has caused significant financial harm to GHL.
In response, Ogude asserted that First Bank did not deceive the court to obtain the order and emphasised that the bank provided all relevant facts in its affidavit supporting the suit. After considering the arguments presented, the judge reserved the ruling for a later date, which will be communicated to both parties.