-
Writes Federal High Court CJ
By Tony John, Port Harcourt
The legal team representing Farah Dagogo, former federal lawmaker and 2023 governorship aspirant in Rivers State, has formally protested the relocation of his legal challenge against the federal government’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State.
The suit, originally filed in the Port Harcourt Division of the Federal High Court, has been transferred to the Abuja Division, following a directive from the Attorney-General of the Federation.
On Tuesday, March 18, 2025, President Bola Tinubu declared a state of emergency in Rivers State, citing alleged security threats.
The President further suspended the state’s democratically elected leadership and appointed Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retd) as Sole Administrator of the state.
In response, Dagogo initiated Suit No: FHC/PH/CS/50/2025 on Wednesday, April 9, 2025, challenging the constitutionality of the President’s actions.
The suit names as defendants the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the President of the Senate, the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the appointed Administrator.
The matter, presided over by Justice Turaki Mohammed, was adjourned until Monday, May 26, 2025, for further proceedings.
However, before the scheduled date, the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court approved a request by the Attorney-General of the Federation to transfer the case to Abuja.
In a protest letter addressed to the Chief Judge and copied to the Presiding Judge of the Federal High Court in Port Harcourt, Dagogo’s lead counsel, Cosmas Enweluzo, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), criticised the transfer as a violation of judicial independence and due process.
He stated: “Your Lordship, allowing a party to dictate the forum of adjudication sets a dangerous precedent and erodes public confidence in the justice system.”
The legal team argued that the Attorney-General, being a party to the suit through representation of the President, lacks the statutory authority to initiate or influence the transfer of a case from one judicial division to another.
The letter emphasised that no party had filed an application before the court seeking a transfer based on legally permissible grounds, such as manifest injustice.
Enweluzo continued: “The current development amounts to forum shopping and constitutes an abuse of court process.”
The counsel reiterated that the Port Harcourt Division of the Federal High Court is the appropriate forum for adjudication, as the effects of the state of emergency and the actions of the administrator are being felt in Rivers State.
He argued further that both the plaintiff and the appointed administrator reside in Rivers State.
“Judicial divisions are created for administrative convenience. Litigants have the constitutional right to institute actions in any division with competent jurisdiction over the subject matter,” Enweluzo added.
The legal team urged the Chief Judge to reconsider the decision and uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.
“We respectfully urge Your Lordship not to accede to any directive or communication that seeks to undermine the established rules of court and the constitutional right to fair hearing. We are confident that justice will be done and seen to be done in this matter.”
This protest comes amid growing public and legal scrutiny over the constitutional implications of the emergency declaration and the federal government’s authority to suspend elected state officials.