Follow Us on Google
By Ajiri Daniels
Rivers State is approaching another defining political moment. In 2027, the choice before its people will be bigger than the familiar contest for political power. It will be a choice about the direction of the state, the quality of leadership it wants and whether its enormous potential can finally be converted into prosperity that reaches ordinary people.
For a state as strategically important, economically endowed and politically influential as Rivers, the stakes could hardly be higher. The people are not merely looking for another occupant of Government House. They are looking for leadership that can rise above political rivalries, unite a deeply diverse state, attract investment, create opportunities for its young population and restore confidence in the possibility of a better future.
It is against this backdrop that the candidacy of the Nigeria Democratic Congress governorship candidate, Dumo Lulu-Briggs, deserves serious consideration.
Lulu-Briggs enters the 2027 race with a proposition that is different from the usual politics of Rivers State: that governance should be measured not by the strength of political machinery behind a governor, but by the quality of life that government delivers to its people.
He is not a political newcomer. A lawyer, businessman and philanthropist, Lulu-Briggs has spent years building experience in the private sector and participating in the political life of Rivers State. He has contested the governorship twice before and is now making a third attempt, bringing with him a deeper understanding of the political terrain and the challenges confronting the state.
His return is significant because the political environment has changed. Across Rivers, there is a growing appetite for leadership that is less consumed by political confrontation and more focused on the practical business of governing.
That is where Lulu-Briggs’ candidacy can find its strongest argument.
Rivers State has oil. It has waterways, a strategic coastline, a major commercial centre, vast human capital and an entrepreneurial population. Yet the question remains: why has this enormous potential not translated into a broader prosperity for the people?
The answer cannot simply be another cycle of political promises. Rivers needs leadership that understands production, investment, enterprise and wealth creation.
Lulu-Briggs’ experience in the oil and gas industry and the private sector gives him a perspective that is particularly relevant to this challenge. It does not automatically make him a better governor, but it gives him an understanding of how businesses are built, how investment decisions are made and how economic opportunities can be created beyond dependence on government revenue.
The difference is fundamental. A government can distribute money. A transformational government creates an environment in which people can make money. That is the kind of conversation the 2027 election should provoke.
There is also the question of political independence. Rivers has seen what happens when political power becomes an end in itself. Political battles can consume enormous energy, while the issues that matter most to ordinary citizens—security, jobs, infrastructure, education, healthcare and economic opportunity, receive less attention than they deserve. The Government House should not be the headquarters of a political war. It should be the engine room of development.
Lulu-Briggs has an opportunity to make that distinction central to his campaign. His strongest argument should not be that he comes from a prominent family or has the resources to contest an expensive election. It should be that he has the capacity, experience and independence to govern Rivers for all Rivers people. That message becomes even more important in a state as diverse as Rivers.
From the riverine communities to the upland areas, from the traditional institutions to the business community, from young professionals to farmers, artisans and workers, every part of Rivers deserves to see itself reflected in the priorities of government.
The recent endorsement of Lulu-Briggs by the Orashi National Congress is therefore noteworthy. It reflects, among other things, the growing conversation around political inclusion, equity and the aspiration of communities to have a meaningful voice in determining the future leadership of the state.
The real question should not be who controls Rivers. It should be who can govern Rivers for everybody. Some will point to Lulu-Briggs’ previous attempts and ask why this time should be different. But political experience is not measured only by victories. Sometimes, the lessons of defeat produce a more prepared candidate.
Lulu-Briggs returns to the race with the benefit of having contested before, understood the terrain, built political relationships and refined his understanding of the demands of the office he seeks. He now has another opportunity to place his case before Rivers voters. And ultimately, the voters will judge him not by the noise surrounding the election, but by the credibility of his proposition.
Can he unite Rivers? Can he attract investment? Can he create jobs and economic opportunities? Can he build institutions that outlive personalities? Can he provide security and infrastructure? Can he engage the Federal Government effectively while defending the interests of Rivers State? These are the questions that should define the 2027 governorship contest.
For Lulu-Briggs, the opportunity is to make his candidacy bigger than a personal ambition or another political contest. He can make it a conversation about the future of Rivers State. A state of Rivers’ importance cannot afford to spend another generation trapped in politics without corresponding development. Its people deserve a government that sees political power as a responsibility, not an entitlement; public resources as a trust, not a prize; and leadership as an opportunity to build, not merely an opportunity to rule. That is the space in which Dumo Lulu-Briggs must position himself. Not simply as another candidate seeking the Government House. But as a candidate asking Rivers people to consider whether it is time for a different model of leadership.
The final decision belongs to the people.
