By Sunday Ani
Following the recent claim by a certain female professor who said she was contacted by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan to bear false witness in the sexual harassment allegation against the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, the National Coordinator, Action Collective, Mr Teddy Onyejuwe, said the falsity of woman’s claim has been exposed.
He noted that while the woman was on live on Facebook, showcasing the alleged chats she had with Natasha, her WhatsApp call log flashed for a split second and a missed call from “Senator Akpabio SP,” was displayed.
He noted that the woman was just a hireling on a mission to destroy Natasha for a price but unfortunately her game was over when her phone revealed a missed call from Akpabio, whom she claimed she never knew.
He said: “When the gods want to disgrace a man, they first bless him with the arrogance to undo himself. It never begins with thunder. It starts with one careless moment of a missed call that tells the whole story. That was the day the ‘female professor’ went live on Facebook to do a dirty job.
“Her mission was clear, to destroy Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s reputation with claims so wild they belonged in a badly written Nollywood script such as treason, conspiracy to murder and bribery. It was a production of manipulation disguised as concern. She raised her voice to the heavens, except that it wasn’t her voice that betrayed her, but her phone screen.
“In the middle of her drama, while showcasing alleged chats with Natasha, her WhatsApp call log flashed for a split second.
“And there it was – a missed call from ‘Senator Akpabio SP.’ It didn’t happen before or after the show; it happened during the performance. At the very moment she was vomiting her lies, the Senate President that Natasha accused of sexual harassment was calling her.
“This is from the same woman who insisted she didn’t know any Akpabio or ‘SP’ as in Senate President. So what exactly was his name doing on her phone, calling her live during her performance?
“Why would Nigeria’s Senate President be calling a woman mid-livestream while she was targeting the very woman accusing him of sexual harassment?
“What sort of relationship exists for a sitting Senate President to be that comfortable making that call at that time she’s orchestrating what now looks like a digital assassination? What explanation makes sense outside of coordination for such a calculated interruption?
“Why would she claim ignorance of Akpabio, when her own call log proves a direct, active link?”
Onyejuwe insisted that the livestream that was meant to destroy Natasha became evidence in plain sight. He described it was digital crime scene with the call log as the blood on the floor, stressing that the screen exposed what her lips tried to hide.
He said: “What we witnessed wasn’t mere coincidence. It was a political autopsy gone wrong and a digital bloodstain on a floor someone forgot to mop. It takes only one second of carelessness to unravel a well funded deception.”
He further stated that the revelation on the woman’s phone did not stop with Akpabio, as names of other powerful men in the senate and security circle were also splashed on her phone screen
“These are players with deep ties to political machinery and security architecture. So who is this woman? Is she a journalist, a security agent, a civil rights crusader? Or a political contractor used by men too weak to fight their battles in daylight? Simply put, is she a politically convenient hit-woman for hire?
“When power miscalculates, it’s never in the noise but in the moment arrogance forgets to cover its tracks.
“She wasn’t narrating a story, she was acting. Her eyes kept dropping. Her lines were too clean. She was reading from a script. Whoever handed her that script forgot to tell her to turn off notifications and erase the call history. That was the mistake.”